What Is the Amplitude of Two Interfering Waves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waves
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi all.

I have two loudspeakers placed on the x-axis at -L and L respectively. Now I have found the resulting wave at a point z0 on the z-axis. I've used the superposition-principle, and I've arrived at the following expression:

<br /> \widetilde f(\overrightarrow r ,t) = 2A\exp \left[ {i\left( {\frac{{\alpha \left( {\left( {x + y} \right) + \left( {x - y} \right)} \right)}}{2} - \omega t} \right)} \right]\cos \left( {\alpha \frac{{\left( {\left( {x + y} \right) - \left( {x - y} \right)} \right)}}{2}} \right)<br />

where the tilde over f indicates that it is complex.

Question: What part of the expression for f is the ampltitude? Is it only 2A, or is it the expontential term and 2A the ampltitude?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:
<br /> \widetilde f(\overrightarrow r ,t) = 2A\exp \left[ {i\left( {\frac{{\alpha \left( {\left( {x + y} \right) + \left( {x - y} \right)} \right)}}{2} - \omega t} \right)} \right]\cos \left( {\alpha \frac{{\left( {\left( {x + y} \right) - \left( {x - y} \right)} \right)}}{2}} \right)<br />

Question: What part of the expression for f is the ampltitude? Is it only 2A, or is it the expontential term and 2A the ampltitude?
It depends on what you mean. AFAIK, there is no standard definition of "amplitude", even in physics. You have obviously encountered the term regarding the constant multiplier in front of a sinusoid. And, perhaps you have also encountered it in QM, since you think you might want to include a complext phase? Anyway, it just depends on why you need to know. I would suggest that, since the time-dependence is entirely contained in the exponential, then "the amplitude" may be most suitably identified as everything else besides the complex exponential.
 
Hmm, I would think it is everything besides the cosine, especially because cosine determines the magnitude of the amplitude then.
 
Niles said:
... the magnitude of the amplitude ...
Hmm.
 
Ok, bad way of expressing it. The cosine-term determines when the wave is at it highest positition (i.e. the amplitude).
 
Niles said:
The cosine-term determines when the wave is at it highest positition (i.e. the amplitude).
No. The cosine factor partly determines WHERE (not when; where) the wave will be maximum. The cosine factor doesn't contain any time-dependence. But, anyway, it doesn't matter. You are quite free to call everything besides the cosine factor as the amplitude. That was my main point.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top