What is the Angle of Repose for Granular Materials?

AI Thread Summary
The angle of repose is defined as the steepest angle at which granular materials can remain stable without sliding. The discussion centers on finding a suitable theory or empirical equation to test for coursework on this topic. The user has identified three methods to calculate the angle of repose, including a simple funnel experiment with sand to form a cone. They are also using different particle sizes of sand and salt for their experiments. Despite extensive research, they have not found a satisfactory theory or equation to support their investigation.
Rhysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For my coursework, i am investigating the angle of repose of granular materials. However, for my coursework to be. . . successful i need to prove or disprove a theory or an empirical equation which i can test. So far from my research i have not found a simple... or appropriate complexity theory or equation. So... if you know/can think of any theories or equations i can test on this area please let me know.

Background:

Angle or repose is the steepest angle of descent or dip of the slope relative to the horizontal plane when material on the slope face is on the verge of sliding.

I have 3 methods to calculate the angle of repose, each have a different setup.

An example of one - the simplest one. Is to have a funnel full of sand a fixed height above a piece of card. The sand is then released from the funnel (via a nozzle) onto the card. This will form a cone of sand, and from this cone the angle of repose can be calculated, using trig and knowing the radius of the cone. The sand is of a certain particle size, and i have 3 differing particle size sand samples to use. I will also use salt, as it is easy to get differing particle size samples to use.


Thanks in Advance


Rhys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
unfortunately, i have already been on all those sites you suggested. But thanks for the effort
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top