What Is the Coherence Length of a Highly Stabilized He-Ne Laser?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingyof2thejring
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superposition Waves
kingyof2thejring
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A magnetic-field technique for stabilizing a He-Ne laser to 2 parts in 10^10 has been patented. At 632.8 nm, what would be the coherence length of a laser with such frquency stability.


Homework Equations


Coherence time =1/delta frequency
coherence length = c/delta frquency


The Attempt at a Solution



dont know what 10^10 stands for and how to solve this
help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it means that the technique assures you that if you choose to give the laser a frequency f, then the actual frequency of the laser will effectively be f with an uncertainty of only ±(2*f*(10^-10)).

See what I "did"? I shopped up f into 10^10 equal parts, then said that the uncertainty of f is 2 of those parts: 2*(f/[10^10])
 
Last edited:
10^10 means 10 raised to the power of 10, which is 10 billion. So the frequency is stable to 2 parts in 10 billion.

What is the frequency of the HeNe laser?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top