What is the cross product of two 3D vectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter athrun200
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the cross product of two 3D vectors, specifically vector A (i + j - 2k) and vector C (j - 5k). Participants clarify the distinction between vectors and scalars, emphasizing that angular velocity and radius must be treated as vectors. The formula relating vector speed and angular velocity is introduced, highlighting the importance of understanding vector representation in rotational movement. The conversation also touches on the properties of the cross product, particularly how it ignores parallel components. Ultimately, the participants reach a better understanding of how to define the vectors involved and their relationships in the context of rotational dynamics.
athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



attachment.php?attachmentid=37024&stc=1&d=1310175897.jpg


Homework Equations



A=i+j-2k
C=j-5k

The Attempt at a Solution



attachment.php?attachmentid=37025&stc=1&d=1310175897.jpg


How to obtain the correct answer?
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    7.4 KB · Views: 571
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    16.9 KB · Views: 563
Physics news on Phys.org
Velocity is a vector tangential at point C to the circular path traced out.
 
Hi athrun200! :smile:

Let's first get the definition and the relevant formulas in order.

Can you say what kind of rotational movement is made?
That is, what is the axis?

I'm feeling generous, so I'll give you the formula that relates vector speed and angular velocity. :wink:

It's:
\vec v = \vec \omega \times \vec r
Note that these are all vectors and that the multiplication is the cross product.
Are your familiar with the vector representation of an angular velocity?
And are you familiar with the cross product?
 
I like Serena said:
Hi athrun200! :smile:

Let's first get the definition and the relevant formulas in order.

Can you say what kind of rotational movement is made?
That is, what is the axis?

I'm feeling generous, so I'll give you the formula that relates vector speed and angular velocity. :wink:

It's:
\vec v = \vec \omega \times \vec r
Note that these are all vectors and that the multiplication is the cross product.
Are your familiar with the vector representation of an angular velocity?
And are you familiar with the cross product?

I think vector A is the rotation axis.

I am familiar with cross product but I am not sure how to get r.
Is r means the radius of the ratation?

If it is, then both\vec \omega and\vec r are scalars. (\vec \omega =2 which is given)

If both of them is scalars, then the velocity should be scalar too.
However the answer is a vector.

This is what I am not understand.
 
Yes, the vector A is the rotation axis.

You seem very eager to turn vectors into scalars. Don't! They're not.
They were marked with an arrow on top for a purpose. They are vectors and not scalars.

The question becomes how to find these vectors.

From your answer I deduce that you are not aware of the vector representation of the angular velocity.
(Since you didn't answer my question and went on converting vectors into scalars.)

So here's a picture from wikipedia that more or less shows what's intended.
250px-Angular_velocity.svg.png


However, in this picture r is shown to be a vector starting in the center of the circular motion.
This is not required. r can be a vector that starts on any point of the rotational axis.
I just couldn't find a better picture yet.

The vector of angular velocity is the vector that is parallel with the axis of rotation, and that has a length that is equal to the scalar angular velocity.

Can you write down the vector representation of angular velocity?
And can you say which vector r is intended now?
 
I like Serena said:
Yes, the vector A is the rotation axis.

You seem very eager to turn vectors into scalars. Don't! They're not.
They were marked with an arrow on top for a purpose. They are vectors and not scalars.

The question becomes how to find these vectors.

From your answer I deduce that you are not aware of the vector representation of the angular velocity.
(Since you didn't answer my question and went on converting vectors into scalars.)

So here's a picture from wikipedia that more or less shows what's intended.
250px-Angular_velocity.svg.png


However, in this picture r is shown to be a vector starting in the center of the circular motion.
This is not required. r can be a vector that starts on any point of the rotational axis.
I just couldn't find a better picture yet.

The vector of angular velocity is the vector that is parallel with the axis of rotation, and that has a length that is equal to the scalar angular velocity.

Can you write down the vector representation of angular velocity?
And can you say which vector r is intended now?



Oh, it is my first time to know that angular velocity is along the axis of rotation.(When I studied A-Level physics, it didn't mention anything about vector all of them is scalar.)

So, in order to make the angular velocity lies on the axis of rotation, we get 2\vec{A}. However, the magnitude is not 2. To ensure the vector has magnitude of 2, we need to have the unit vector of \vec{A}.
Thus \vec{\omega}=2\frac{\vec{A}}{\vec{|A|}}

I am not sure for \vec{r}.
Is \vec{r}=\vec{C}-\vec{A}?
 
athrun200 said:
Thus \vec{\omega}=2\frac{\vec{A}}{\vec{|A|}}

Good! And I see you found the [ itex ] tag. :smile:
athrun200 said:
I am not sure for \vec{r}.
Is \vec{r}=\vec{C}-\vec{A}?

Vector A is a vector of arbitrary length defining the axis.
Vector C is a vector from the axis to the point you're interesting for finding the velocity vector.
You'll find your result comes out the same if you add any multiple of A to it (since effectively its starting point will still be on the axis)! :wink:
To be clear if you take \vec{r}=\vec{C} that will be just fine.
 
Last edited:
Thx! I get the answer.

I like Serena said:
(since effectively its starting point will still be on the axis)
But I still don't understand why I can use both \vec{r}=\vec{A}+\vec{C} and \vec{r}=\vec{A}-\vec{C}.
Do you have any further information about this? (e.g. website or books)

Thx so much:approve:
 
Not really. I don't have any books myself about it, nor do I know of a website :)
You can try e.g. wikipedia, but perhaps that is a bit too much for you.

Basically it's a property of the cross product, which looks at the part where 2 vectors are perpendicular to each other. Any parallel part is effectively ignored.

You can also see it algebraically. That is:
(\vec A + \vec C) \times \vec A = (\vec A \times \vec A) + (\vec C \times \vec A) = \vec 0 + (\vec C \times \vec A)
Note that the cross product of a vector with itself is zero.
 
  • #10
I like Serena said:
Not really. I don't have any books myself about it, nor do I know of a website :)
You can try e.g. wikipedia, but perhaps that is a bit too much for you.

Basically it's a property of the cross product, which looks at the part where 2 vectors are perpendicular to each other. Any parallel part is effectively ignored.

You can also see it algebraically. That is:
(\vec A + \vec C) \times \vec A = (\vec A \times \vec A) + (\vec C \times \vec A) = \vec 0 + (\vec C \times \vec A)
Note that the cross product of a vector with itself is zero.
I understand now, thanks so much.
 
Back
Top