What is the effect of distance on the force created by a laser in outer space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bmb2009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Em Force Laser
bmb2009
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two astronauts are at rest in outer space, one 15.3 m from the Space Shuttle and the other 30.6 m from the Shuttle. Using a 123.0-W laser, the astronaut located 30.6 m away from the Shuttle decides to propel the other astronaut toward the Space Shuttle. He focuses the laser on a piece of totally reflecting fabric on her space suit. If her total mass with equipment is 129.0 kg, how long will it take her to reach the Space Shuttle?


Homework Equations



Force=Power/c



The Attempt at a Solution



Since Force=Power/speed of light

F=(123W)/(3x10^8)
F=4.1E-7 since F=ma (4.1E-7)/129kg = accel= 3.178E-9 m/s^2

the laser causes constant acceleration so...
Df=Do + VoT+ 1/2aT^2
and I solved for T... with Df = 15.3 meters, Do and Vo both equal 0.

but this didn't work and I have no idea where to go from here. Does the distance of the second astronaut (the one shooting the laser) affect the calculation? Any help?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is just a suggestion:
If it's a totaly reflecting surface shouldn't the force (F) of the beam be doubled?

Just like if water hits the back of a spoon as compared to the front of a spoon. The water hitting the front is deflected and therefore puts a greater force on the spoon.
 
I just tried your hunch and you were correct. Thanks a bunch!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top