What is the Electric Field at Point P Due to a Uniformly Charged Rod?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at point P due to a uniformly charged rod, with specific parameters provided. The user initially attempted to solve the problem using the electric field equation but arrived at an incorrect answer of 7.48 n/C instead of the correct 12.4 N/C. They realized that the mistake was in the integration process, particularly in handling the variable x and incorporating the correct trigonometric substitutions. After further clarification and guidance from another user, the original poster corrected their approach to successfully solve the problem. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate integration techniques in physics problems involving electric fields.
glennpagano44
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Halliday and Resnick edition 7 chapter 22 number 29

In Fig 22-45, positive charge q = 7.81 pC is spread uniformly along a thin nonconducting rod of length L = .145m. The y distance between the point and rod is R = .06m. What is the magnitude and direction of the electric field produced at point P.

I will attempt to describe the figure:

There is a thin nonconducting rod in the x dimension with length L and a point P is directly above the center of the rod in the y dimension (R = .06m).

Homework Equations



E = (1/4\pi\epsilon)(q/r^{2})

The Attempt at a Solution



\intdE = 1/4\pi\epsilon\int\lambdaRdx/(R^{2}+x^{2})^{3/2}
I then took lamba and R out of the integral since they are constants
(4 is not rasied to (\pi\epsilon)

After taking the integral I got:

(\lambda/4\pi\epsilon)(x/R(R^{2}+x^{2})^{1/2}

When I plug in for the varibles I do not get the correct answer, I get 7.48 n/C but the correct answer is 12.4 N/C

I plug in L for x and R for R and for \lambda I use q/L
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi glennpagano44! :smile:

(have a lambda: λ and an epsilon: ε and a pi: π and a square-root: √ :wink:)
glennpagano44 said:
After taking the integral I got:

(\lambda/4\pi\epsilon)(x/R(R^{2}+x^{2})^{1/2}

No … how can you still have an x when you've just eliminated x by integrating over it?

And where did that extra R come from? :confused:
 
I went back to class today and I figured it out thanks alot. I just integrated it wrong, I had to do some trig subsitutions. (that is where the extra R came from)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top