What is the Electric Field on a Metallic Surface in an Electrostatic Field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the electric field on a metallic surface placed in an electrostatic field using Gauss's Law. The initial approach involves setting up a cylindrical Gaussian surface, but it is clarified that the side area does not contribute to the electric field calculation since it is parallel to the surface. The correct expression for the electric field is derived as E = σ/ε, where σ is the surface charge density. Additionally, the conversation touches on the comparison with a parallel plate capacitor, emphasizing the cancellation of fields inside the metal and the addition of fields outside. Overall, the key takeaway is the importance of understanding the contributions of different areas in the Gaussian surface to accurately calculate the electric field.
Sixty3
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A metallic surface is placed in an electrostatic field. Derive an expression for the electric field on the metal surface.

Homework Equations


\oint \underline{E} \cdot d\underline{A}=\dfrac{q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}

The Attempt at a Solution


My initial thought was to set up a cylindrical Gaussian surface, I've tried to show it in the picture attachment.
s1sz2r.png

Then the dA facing downwards will be 0 since the electric field within the metal is 0, and the 'side' of the cylinder dA is perpendicular to the electric field and also 0. So the only contribution is the upward facing circular area. Letting Δh→0, it gives the electric field on the surface, EA=q/ε, and q/A=σ the surface charge density. So E=σ/ε.

Is this method correct, I'm not entirely sure to be honest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks a bit like you're overthinking it. All that matters is the total surface area of this cylinder in this case.

So, how could you calculate the total surface area?

Well, you've got two circles at each end of the cylinder, so that surface area would be two times the area of a circle.
$$A_{1} = 2\pi r^2$$

For the second part of calculating the surface area, it would just be the total length of your cylinder times the length, ##l##, of the cylinder.
$$A_{2} = 2\pi r l$$

Total surface area:
$$SA = A_{1}+A_{2}$$

Plugging into Gauss's Law and simplifying yields:
$$E = \frac {2 k_{c} q_{enc}}{r(l+r)
}$$

Note that $$k_{c} = \frac {1}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}$$ so this is how the ##k_{c}## appeared.
 
The total field is the sum of the external applied field plus the field due to the charge on the surface of the metal. Inside the metal the fields are in opposite direction and cancel. Outside they are in the same direction and add up.
 
Rellek said:
Looks a bit like you're overthinking it. All that matters is the total surface area of this cylinder in this case.

So, how could you calculate the total surface area?

Well, you've got two circles at each end of the cylinder, so that surface area would be two times the area of a circle.
$$A_{1} = 2\pi r^2$$

For the second part of calculating the surface area, it would just be the total length of your cylinder times the length, ##l##, of the cylinder.
$$A_{2} = 2\pi r l$$

Total surface area:
$$SA = A_{1}+A_{2}$$

Plugging into Gauss's Law and simplifying yields:
$$E = \frac {2 k_{c} q_{enc}}{r(l+r)
}$$

Note that $$k_{c} = \frac {1}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}$$ so this is how the ##k_{c}## appeared.

That solution is not correct. The side area does not contribute because the field is parallel to the surface.
 
Imagine a parallel plate capacitor with potential V across the plates, and you slide a plate inbetween the plates. What is the E field before & after sliding the plate?

(You can use 5 Gaussian surfaces to derive 6 equations in 6 unknowns; the last equation has to do with the voltage V).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top