What is the electric force of the molecule on the proton?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric force exerted by an ammonia molecule (NH3) on a proton located 2.50 nm away. The initial calculation yielded a force of 5.0 x 10^-13 N, which was questioned for its accuracy. Participants suggested using more significant digits and converting to atomic units for better clarity, as human-scale units can misrepresent values at the atomic level. The importance of appropriate unit selection for atomic-scale systems was emphasized to avoid confusion. Ultimately, the original poster acknowledged the feedback and corrected their understanding.
Bigworldjust
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An ammonia molecule (NH3) has a permanent electric dipole moment 5.0 x 10^-30cm. A proton is 2.50nm from the molecule in the plane that bisects the dipole.

What is the electric force of the molecule on the proton?


Homework Equations



F = QE = eE_yj = (-kpe)/(d^3)j

The Attempt at a Solution



((9*10^9 N*m^2/C^2)(5.0*10^-30 C*m)(1.6*10^-19 C))/(2.5*10^-9)^3

This gives me an answer of 5.0*10^-13 N, but that seems to be wrong. Anyone know where I went wrong here? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. You need to use more digits. My answer is about 10% off yours.
2. Why does this seem wrong? Is it because it's very small? Try converting this to atomic units i.e. eV/nm (electron charge*1V/nm) or calculate the resulting acceleration assuming no other forces (in m/s^2 or nm/ns^2).

The thing about atomic scale systems is that using human scale units is not appropriate. N,m,s,kg just don't make sense as good units, and it makes large quantities seem small and small quantities large.
 
frogjg2003 said:
1. You need to use more digits. My answer is about 10% off yours.
2. Why does this seem wrong? Is it because it's very small? Try converting this to atomic units i.e. eV/nm (electron charge*1V/nm) or calculate the resulting acceleration assuming no other forces (in m/s^2 or nm/ns^2).

The thing about atomic scale systems is that using human scale units is not appropriate. N,m,s,kg just don't make sense as good units, and it makes large quantities seem small and small quantities large.
Ah, okay I see what you mean. I finally got it, thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top