What Is the Electrostatic Force Between an Ideal Dipole and a Conducting Plate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter millifarads
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole Force Work
millifarads
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the electrostatic attraction force F between a point dipole and an infinite metallic conducting plate. The dipole moment p is perpendicular to the plate and the distance from the dipole to the plate is h. Find the work that has to be done in order to move dipole from position h1 to h2.

Homework Equations



\vec{F}^{\,} = \vec{p}^{\,} \frac{\partial E}{\partial x}
\vec{E}^{\,} = - \frac {\vec{p}^{\,}}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^3}
W = qV
V = \frac {\vec{p}^{\,} \cdot \hat{r} } {4\pi\epsilon_0r^2}
r = 2h

The Attempt at a Solution



Calculating the force seems to be straightforward. I've set the problem up using images, with a dipole of the opposite dipole moment a distance -h away from the plate, directly under it. ie. r = 2h. The dipole moment of the real dipole should point away from the plate, and same with the image dipole moment. This seems arbitrary, though, as I think the dipole could be pointing either way. Then:

\vec{E}^{\,} = - \frac {\vec{p}^{\,}}{4\pi\epsilon_0(2h)^3} = - \frac {\vec{p}^{\,}}{32\pi\epsilon_0h^3}

So, \vec{F}^{\,} = \vec{p}^{\,} \frac{\partial E}{\partial h} = \vec{p}^{\,} \frac{3\vec{p}^{\,}}{32\pi\epsilon_0h^4} = \frac{3 p^2}{32\pi\epsilon_0h^4}

Now at this point, assuming I've done everything correctly and the formulas I've listed are right, I'm not sure how to evaluate the potential. The r hat unit vector should point the same way as the dipole, right? So in the case I've set up, away from the plate and perpendicular to it. Is the potential then just:

V = \frac {p} {4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} = \frac {p} {16\pi\epsilon_0h^2}

Then, evaluate this at the distances of h1 and h2 and take the difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top