Archived What is the equivalent capcitance of this circuit - Figured it out.

  • Thread starter Thread starter riseofphoenix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Equivalent
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the equivalent capacitance of a circuit with capacitors C1, C2, C3, and C4. Initially, the poster struggles with the problem, believing none of the provided answers are correct. After reevaluating, they determine that the parallel combination of C1 and C2 yields 5 F, and then they correctly calculate the series combination with C3 and C4, arriving at an equivalent capacitance of 8.5 F. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding how capacitances in parallel and series interact differently, with a reminder that charges in parallel add while voltages in series do. The final conclusion confirms that the calculated equivalent capacitance aligns with the expected answer.
riseofphoenix
Messages
294
Reaction score
2
What is the equivalent capcitance of this circuit! -- Figured it out.

I have a Physics final exam in 2 hours and I'm re-reviewing things...

This problem DOESN'T make any sense!

HELP_zps7fc6f1a6.png


17. If C1 = 2 F, C2 = 3 F, C3 = 5 F, C4 = 6 F, the equivalent capacitance of the circuit is:


A. 8.5 F is supposed to be the answer - that makes NO sense
B. 16 F
C. 5.5 F
D. 10 F

I didn't get ANY of those numbers...
This is what I did.

1) Determine PARALLEL capacitance of C1 and C2

Ceq = C1 + C2
Ceq = 2 +3
Ceq = 5

2) Determine the SERIES capacitance of the whole circuit now

1/Ceq = 1/5 + 1/C3 + 1/C4
1/Ceq = 1/5 + 1/5+ 1/6
1/Ceq = 0.567
Ceq = 1/0.567
Ceq = 1.763 :(:(:(:(!Edit:

Oh wait nvm.

I figured it out.

the upper arm (C net) is- 1/C net = 1/5 + 1/C3 = 1/5 + 1/5 =2/5
=>C net = 5/2 = 2.5
now 2.5 and 6 in parallel- 2.5+6 = 8.5
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Electron Spin
Physics news on Phys.org
Claims he's figured it out. Looks good to me.
 
  • Like
Likes Electron Spin
Stream of consciousness thinking, charges in parallel add up so capacitances in parallel add up. So the capacitance of the combination C1 and C2 is 2 + 3 = 5. They've made it easy for you, you have two equal capacitances in series. So the voltage across one of them Is half the total voltage. So the charge on this one is 5/2 = 2.5. Add that to the 6 on C4 and you have got 8.5. Quite fast.

I haven't put in pedantries like units :oldbiggrin: because this is stream of consciousness thinking for a quiz.

Just remember - it makes sense I hope - that charges in parallel add up whereas the voltages in series and up. The charge on the leftmost plate in series equals that on the rightmost plate (though opposite sign) and that is the total charge on the equivalent capacitor. The internal plates not connected to conductor have total zero charge (though separated into a positive and negative one).

Because of this if you have say equal capacitances in series the total capacitance is less than that of anyone of them. Not realising that is why you thought the given answer didn't make any sense.
 
Last edited:
I know you exam is over but if you are interested...
BIG EASY HINT: to add L and C values..

You would total L's just like Resistors...

Totaling C's are opposite of resistors.. ( parallel C's you add like series R's, and series C's you combine (add) like parallel R's..1/1/C1+1/C2+1/C3...

IOW: You would total parallel C's as you would add series R's in a network. and when you total series C's in series, total them like you would total parallel R's.
Again,

- Treat the totaling of parallel capacitor values, opposite mathematically, as if they were like series resistor values, but only when 'totaling' their values, not their AC reactances!1.
- Treat the totaling of series or parallel Inductor values as if they were resistors.
img527.png
I always suggested to start with parallel capacitors because it's easy to see in your mind's eye...:oldwink:

Slide C2 up to the 'plates' of C1 note the combined total capacitance doubles in value, in plate area so to speak.What you are doing is actually, or electronically is combining the plate area twice, as to increase the capacitance twice..:oldwink:

Hence, L's are like R's and C's are opposite of R's, when totaling.

1 This is a completely different story for a different time.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-10-11_15-5-8.png
    upload_2016-10-11_15-5-8.png
    772 bytes · Views: 446
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top