What is the expression for vertical velocity in a simple harmonic oscillator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nissanztt90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
nissanztt90
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Vertical equation for motion:

\frac{d^2z}{dt^2} +v^2 = 0

which corresponds to a simple harmonic oscillator, with an angular frequency v = \sqrt{4 \pi G \rho}. The solution of the diff eq can be written as z(t) = Asin(vt+\phi_0)

where z(t) is the vertical position of a test particle, A is the amplitude of its motion, and \phi_0 is its initial phase.

Given z(t), write out the expression for the vertical velocity.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Since z(t) is the vertical position, the derivative of z(t) with respect to t would be the velocity? Correct?

And the vertical velocity expression would be \frac{dz}{dt} = Acos(vt+\phi_0) * v? Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that's correct.

Just as an aside, most people and most textbooks use ω for angular velocity, so instead of "vt" those terms would be ωt.

Also, I think the original equation is

<br /> \frac{d^2z}{dt^2} +v^2z = 0<br />
 
Yes your correct about the original equation...also not sure why they used v for the angular velocity.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top