What is the formula for calculating the maximum deflection of a bike axle?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the maximum deflection of a bike axle, the formula (W*a/24*E*I)*(3*l^2-4*a^2) is proposed, with the effective span being the clear distance between the wheel flanges, which is 370mm. The discussion clarifies that the total length of the axle does not need to be included in this calculation. The axle is confirmed to be part of a tricycle, with collars acting as bearing housings to support the load. The inertia of the frame is calculated as 19000mm^4, using the formula for a solid cylindrical shaft, and the load is approximately 700N with E for aluminum at 70GPa. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate measurements and the correct application of the formula for deflection.
Buchanskii
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My Question...

To find the maximum deflection of this axle, can the formula:

(W*a/24*E*I)*(3*l^2-4*a^2)

Will the total length simply be 370mm(wheel to wheel), or will I have to include the total length of the axle?
 

Attachments

  • Axle.jpg
    Axle.jpg
    3 KB · Views: 492
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome Buchanskii.

The effective span will be the clear distance between the wheel flanges. You do not include the length that is within the wheels themselves.

So yes 370 is good.

I am troubled by your formulae but can't help without more information about the cross section and so on. Do the collars noted as F indicated loads from the bicycle frame?
Is this bicycle in fact a tricycle?
 
Hi Studiot, thanks for your help - much appreciated. Sorry about the small Picture aswell, still learning :0

It is Indeed a tricycle; don't know why I put Bicycle. The two collars are attached to the frame in the form of bearing housings, which will support the load of the driver and the frame.

The Inertia of the frame I've worked out as 19000mm^4 using pi*D^4/64 (as it's a solid cylindrical shaft)

Load of approximately 700N

E aluminium 70GPA

a being distance between wheel and load.

Just was wondering about the length, a fellow student put doubt into my mind.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top