What is the frequency of the tuning fork?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the frequency of a tuning fork using the lengths of air columns above water in a tube. The first harmonic is identified at L1 = 0.100 m, while L2 = 0.450 m is used to find the wavelength. The difference between L2 and L1 is established as half the wavelength, leading to the equation λ = 2(L2 - L1). Using the speed of sound at 343 m/s, the correct frequency is calculated as 490 Hz. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between resonant lengths and wavelength in closed tubes.
K3nt70
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A tuning fork is set into vibration above a vertical open tube filled with water, as seen in the figure below.

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/5817/dgian1686mm6.gif

The water level is allowed to drop slowly. As it does so, the air in the tube above the water level is heard to resonate with the tuning fork when the distance from the tube opening to the water level is L1 = 0.100 m and L2 = 0.450 m. What is the frequency of the tuning fork? Assume that the speed of sound in air is 343 m/s.



Homework Equations



f1 = \frac{\upsilon}{4L}

where v = 343 m/s



The Attempt at a Solution




I know that when the distance between the tuning fork and surface of the water is 0.1m. This means it is the first harmonic. Since it it a closed tube, i use the formula for the first harmonic of a closed tube, but my frequency comes out to 858 Hz which is incorrect.


I'm sure that i have to use the second length they give to us, but I'm not sure what its for..


cheers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Errr, I think the question is wrong or something, because the resonant lengths are supposed to be 1/4 lambda (lambda is wavelength), 3/4 lambda, 5/4 lambda, etc...

So I think either your L1 or L2 is incorrectly given. But otherwise, I think the formula you're using should be fine...I don't think you have to use L2. Maybe they put it into trick you? Haha, hope that helped a little?
 
well. I'm fairly sure the question is correct; when there are problems with assignment questions, they can change them asap (since its over the internet). And seeing as this assignment is somewhat old, (im reviewing for a test) they've had a lot of time to fix it ;P
 
K3nt70 said:

Homework Statement



A tuning fork is set into vibration above a vertical open tube filled with water, as seen in the figure below.

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/5817/dgian1686mm6.gif

The water level is allowed to drop slowly. As it does so, the air in the tube above the water level is heard to resonate with the tuning fork when the distance from the tube opening to the water level is L1 = 0.100 m and L2 = 0.450 m. What is the frequency of the tuning fork? Assume that the speed of sound in air is 343 m/s.

Oh, I just did this
Well, v=fLambda
Lamda=2(L2-L1)
so Lambda=.7
so now 343=fLambda
f=343*.7
f=247.1

Hope that helps
 
Last edited by a moderator:
oh. yeah. warmfire540's answer looks right. gee...this is a good sign... i have a physics exam on monday and i can't get these questions right!
 
Its actually f = v/lambda, so 343/0.7 = 490 which is correct. why did you set lambda = 2(L2-L1)? it works to get the correct final answer, but i don't know the logic behind it.
 
Last edited:
Because L2-L1 = 1/2 lambda because the difference between any 2 resonant lengths in a closed tube is 1/2lambda. So knowing that:

1/2lambda = L2-L1
lambda = 2(L2-L1)
 
ooohhhh ok. wow that's a pretty important rule - can't believe i didn't know that. Thanks for your help!
 
K3nt70 said:
Its actually f = v/lambda, so 343/0.7 = 490 which is correct. why did you set lambda = 2(L2-L1)? it works to get the correct final answer, but i don't know the logic behind it.

Yeah, you're right goodjob
Just didn't see that while typing it out! Hope it helped though
:-p
 
  • #10
K3nt70 said:
Its actually f = v/lambda, so 343/0.7 = 490 which is correct. why did you set lambda = 2(L2-L1)? it works to get the correct final answer, but i don't know the logic behind it.

actually knowing \lambda/4=L1
and 3\lambda/4=L2
we can say (L2-L1)= 3\lambda/4 - \lambda/4
= 2\lambda/4
=\lambda/2
(L2-L1)=\lambda/2
2(L2-L1)=\lambda <--- shown
 
Back
Top