What Is the Ideal Resistor Value for a Diode Circuit Using Load-Line Analysis?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the optimal resistor value for a diode circuit using Load-Line Analysis. A 1KΩ resistor was initially tested, resulting in an excessive current for the diode, indicating a need for a higher resistance. Participants confirm the use of the diode equation and suggest that the load line method is accurate for analyzing the circuit. They emphasize the importance of calculating the current based on the diode's forward voltage drop and the resistor value. The conversation concludes with a clarification on the load line method's application in series circuits and its graphical representation.
kenef
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determining the best resistance for my simple circuit consisting of a diode, battery, and resistor. Doing this using Load- Line Analysis

Homework Equations


ID = VD - V / R - Given by KVL[/B]

image014.png
(I can disregard n-pretend )

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
IMG_0817.jpg


Here I have attempted using a 1KΩ resistor, obviously too small because I have a voltage drop of about 8.2V across the resistor so then there should be a drop of approx. 1.8 V across the diode. However using the diode equation this gives me way too large of a current.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know that your sketch of ## I=I_0 (exp^{eV/(n k_b T)}-1) ## is real accurate. Otherwise your load line looks close to correct. The ## I_0 =1 E-12 ## is only an estimate. Did you compute the exponential with ## e=1.602 E-19 ##, ## k_b=1.381 E-23 ##, and ## T=300 ## with ## V=.7 ##? And n=2? The diode equation is only an estimate, but I think experimentally you are likely to get close to I=9 mA with ## R=1 k \Omega ##. I think the ## V_{on}=.7 \, Volts ## for a silicon diode is a pretty good number.
 
Dear Charles, yes I did compute it with all of those values, however the computation I perform with a 1KΩ gives me a current that is too high for my diode, thus I know that I need a resistor with higher resistance. I will attempt to use the online DESMO software and see what that will give me. Should be a tad bit more accurate with the graph. From my work though is it accurate the steps I took to determine the load line? I am simply asking because this is what I THINK is correct, but this is also my first type encountering such a load - line problem.

Thanks!
 
kenef said:
Dear Charles, yes I did compute it with all of those values, however the computation I perform with a 1KΩ gives me a current that is too high for my diode, thus I know that I need a resistor with higher resistance. I will attempt to use the online DESMO software and see what that will give me. Should be a tad bit more accurate with the graph. From my work though is it accurate the steps I took to determine the load line? I am simply asking because this is what I THINK is correct, but this is also my first type encountering such a load - line problem.

Thanks!
You did it correctly. The load line is very useful also in cases where the DC voltage varies for constant resistance. In that case the x-intercept (Voltage of the voltage source) will vary with the entire load line moving in the horizontal direction. Every so often I have encountered problems that use the load line method to solve them. ## \\ ## For your diode current, I do think if you use ## V_{Diode}=.7 ## and compute current ## I=(V_0-.7)/R ## it will give you a fairly accurate answer without the load line method. I googled the Schockley diode equation, and they did not give a precise value for ## I_0 ## or n. I think you can get considerable variation in these parameters from one diode to another. ## \\ ## Just an additional item about the load line method: You begin with a graph of your working component, in this case ## I=I(V_{Diode}) ## i.e. of ## I ## vs. ## V_{Diode} ##. In a series circuit(It only works for the series circuit) you have ## V_0=I R +V_{diode} ##. This equation can be written (solving for ## I=I_{Diode} ) ## as ## I=-(1/R) V_{Diode}+(V_0/R) ## which is a straight line (with ## I=y ## and ## V_{Diode}=x ##) that has slope ## m=-1/R ## and the x-intercept is ## V_0 ##. (Usually you use ## \ ## ## y=mx+b ##, and ## b ## is the y-intercept), but here the x-intercept is important. The intersection of the load line with the graph of ## I=I(V_{Diode}) ## is the operating point.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top