What is the Initial Mass Function Problem?

kranav
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello! I am currently working on a initial mass problem and getting nowhere, I need a little help here, the question states

consider a newly formed globular cluster, with total mass 10e6 times that of the sun, and an initial mass function dN/dm = a.m(-2.35) (-2.35 being the power of m of course) in the mass range 0.1-20 mass of the sun, where m=M/mass of the sun. find a.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


what i did till now is
we know that globular clusters have 10e4 to 10e6 stars so

integral of N(m)dm = 10e6 where m ranges from .1 to 20 mass of the sun
with this equation I got the value of N which was too small and used the given equation dN/dm = a.m(-2.35) to find a. Is this method correct ?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kranav said:
integral of N(m)dm = 10e6 where m ranges from .1 to 20 mass of the sun
with this equation I got the value of N which was too small and used the given equation dN/dm = a.m(-2.35) to find a. Is this method correct ?
Thanks.

Shouldn't the number of stars in a given mass range m_1\leq m\leq m_2 be equal to

N=\int_{m_1}^{m_2} dN=\int_{m_1}^{m_2} \frac{dN}{dm}dm

?
 
thank you, ill try using this now
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top