What is the intersection of two lines and how is it determined?

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Determine wether the lines L1, L2 are parallel, skew or intersecting. If they intersect, find the point of intersection.


L1 = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}x\\y\\z\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1\\2\\0\end{array}\right) + t \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1\\-1\\3\end{array}\right)

L2 = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}x\\y\\z\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}2\\1\\4\end{array}\right) + s \left(\begin{array}{ccc}-1\\2\\1\end{array}\right)


For some t, s \in R





3. The Attempt at a Solution

I believe L1 & L2 are not parallel because their direction vectors aren't multiples of each other.

The dot product of their direction vectors are zero; this tells us that they are orthogonal/skew and not parallel.

To find the intersection point we say: L1 = L2

x1 = x2

\left(\begin{array}{ccc}1\\2\\0\end{array}\right) + t \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1\\-1\\3\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}2\\1\\4\end{array}\right) + s \left(\begin{array}{ccc}-1\\2\\1\end{array}\right)

yields the following system of linear equations;

1+t = 2-s
2-t = 1+2s
3t = 4+s

I think maybe it can be re-written as:

t+s = 1
-t-2s = -1
3t-s = 4

Is my working correct so far? If yes, can you guys show me how to solve this set of simultaneous equations to find the actual point of intersection please. Thanks.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi roam! :smile:
roam said:
t+s = 1
-t-2s = -1
3t-s = 4

Is my working correct so far?

Perfect! :biggrin:

And the trick now is to solve two of the equations (I'd suggest the first two :wink:), and see whether the result fits the third one.

Have a go! :smile:
 
Thanks for checking my work. :smile: :smile:

I don't know how to solve this simultaneous equation but I'll have a go;

(1) t+s = 1
(2) -t-2s = -1
(3) 3t-s = 4


If (2) is true then t = 1-2s

And if (1) is true then t+s = 1 => t = 1-s

If (1) and (2) are both true then;

1-2s = 1-s
s = 0

Now from equation (1)
t+s = 1
t = 1

You see? My solutions never fits the third one, what did I do wrong? :rolleyes:
 
roam said:
(1) t+s = 1
(2) -t-2s = -1
(3) 3t-s = 4

If (2) is true then t = 1-2s

And if (1) is true then t+s = 1 => t = 1-s

If (1) and (2) are both true then;

1-2s = 1-s
s = 0

Now from equation (1)
t+s = 1
t = 1

oooh, this is so long-winded.

First, you don't have to say "if (2) is true …": just say "from (2) …"

Second, how about just adding (1) and (2)? :smile:
You see? My solutions never fits the third one, what did I do wrong? :rolleyes:

Nothing! :rolleyes:

Read the question
roam said:
Determine wether the lines L1, L2 are parallel, skew or intersecting. If they intersect, find the point of intersection.

so … ? :smile:
 
so … ? :smile:

So, what can we conclude from this? Does this tell us the system has no solution ie. the system is inconsistent?


Determine wether the lines L1, L2 are parallel, skew or intersecting. If they intersect, find the point of intersection.

Therefore there is no intersection. The lines are skew (they are orthogonal but do not meet).

:rolleyes:
 
roam said:
Therefore there is no intersection. The lines are skew (they are orthogonal but do not meet).

:rolleyes:

:biggrin: Woohoo! :biggrin:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top