What is the larmor radius of an electron in the inner van allen belt?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Larmor radius of an electron in the inner Van Allen belt, where the electron's kinetic energy is significantly greater than its rest energy. The Larmor radius formula is applied, incorporating the electron's mass, velocity, charge, and the magnetic field strength derived from Earth's magnetic field model. Calculations yield a magnetic field strength range between 2.33*10^-5 T and 3.875*10^-6 T, and an estimated maximum Larmor radius of approximately 440 meters. The participant expresses concern about the complexity of the problem, particularly regarding the treatment of relativistic effects and the perpendicular component of velocity. Ultimately, the conclusion reached aligns with the expected answer for the course.
wyosteve
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the larmor radius of an electron in the inner van allen belt?
This is for a General Astr class so I feel like I must be over complicating it.

Electron Kinetic Energy in the inner VA belt: K≥30 [MeV] (much greater then its rest energy)
VA Belt Radius: r~1.1-2.0 Earth Radii

Homework Equations



Larmor Radius: r=(mv)/(qB)
where m is the mass of the particle, v is the component of its velocity perpendicular to the B field, q is the charge of the particle, and B is the B field magnitude at that point.

Earth's B field strength as a function of r: B(r)=(B0*R^3)/r^3
where B_o is the Earths B field strength at its surface, R is the radius of the earth, and r is the distance

Kinetic energy in relativistic terms: K=gm0c2-m0c2
where g is gamma, m is the particles rest mass and c is the speed of light

g=1/\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}

The Attempt at a Solution



First I attempted to solve for B field strength in the inner VA belt

B(1.1R) = (3.1*10^-5)/(1.1^3) = 2.33*10^-5[T]
B(2.0R) = (3.1*10^-5)/(2.0^3) = 3.875*10^-6[T]
So the field strength is between 2.33*10^-5 and 3.875*10^-6 [T]

Next I used the electrons kinetic energy so solve for its velocity

v = \sqrt{[1-(.511/30.511)^2]c^2}
≈2.9996*10^8 [m/s]

now I found the max larmor radius by first assuming that all the electrons velocity is perpendicular (I have no idea how to determine how much of v is in fact perpendicular)
and using the weakest strength of B
r=(9.109*10^-31*2.9996*10^8)/(1.602*10^-19*3.875*10^-6)
≈440[m]
so the larmor radius must be ≤440[m] is my final conclusion

some obvious problems:
1:this doesn't really narrow down my answer very much
2:this course dosent assume any knowlage of relativity (so I must be overcomplicating it)

any input would be appriciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, that is the answer they were looking for.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top