What is the magnitude of the electric field (rod)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field between two uniformly charged glass rods that are 4.70 cm apart and 11.3 cm long, each charged to +10.4 nC. A participant initially calculated the electric field magnitude as -1.21*10^5 N/C but expressed confusion about the validity of treating the rods as infinitely long. Others pointed out that the formula used is applicable only for infinitely long rods, suggesting that the finite length of the rods should be considered. The conversation highlights the need for a different approach or calculus to accurately determine the electric field for rods of finite length. Understanding the limitations of the equations used is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
sunnnystrong
Messages
54
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Two thin glass rods are placed side by side 4.70 cm apart as shown in the diagram below. They are each 11.3 cm long and are uniformly charged to +10.4 nC .

Answer the questions below regarding the electric field along a line which is drawn through the middle of the two glass rods (labeled Bisector in the diagram).

(Figure 1)

Homework Equations


*See attached file for relevant equations*

The Attempt at a Solution



Length = 0.113 m
λ = 9.20×10^−8 C/m
Eo = 8.85*10^-12
r1 = 0.037m
r2 = 0.01m

Using the attached equation... I got -1.21*10^5 N/C ... the magnitude of the field is 1.21*10^5 N/C

I know this is wrong but I am confused as to why?
 

Attachments

  • 222-5-1_Glass_Rods.png
    222-5-1_Glass_Rods.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 468
  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    5.2 KB · Views: 454
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you allowed to treat the rods as infinitely long?
 
TSny said:
Are you allowed to treat the rods as infinitely long?

Honestly, I have no idea. I am confused about how to set this problem up but found this equation in my book.
 
TSny said:
Are you allowed to treat the rods as infinitely long?
I would think not though as they gave you the length of the rods ?
 
sunnnystrong said:
I would think not though as they gave you the length of the rods ?
I tend to agree with you, that they do not want you to approximate the rods as infinitely long. But the formula for E that you are using is for an infinitely long rod.

Do you have an idea of how to handle the case of a rod of finite length? Are you using calculus in your course?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top