What is the minimum frequency of light needed to eject electrons from a metal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter supermenscher
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon Theory
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the minimum frequency of light required to eject electrons from a metal, specifically focusing on the relationship between work function and frequency. The problem is situated within the context of photoelectric effect principles.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the equation relating frequency, work function, and kinetic energy, with some questioning the correctness of their calculations. There is also a secondary problem introduced regarding Compton scattering, prompting inquiries about which wavelength to solve for.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the approach to the photoelectric effect problem, suggesting that the minimum frequency corresponds to zero kinetic energy. Others are attempting to clarify their calculations and seek further assistance on the Compton scattering problem, indicating an ongoing exploration of the topics.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion regarding unit conversions, specifically between joules and electron volts, as well as the need to clarify which wavelength to consider in the Compton scattering problem.

supermenscher
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
What minimum frequency of light is needed to eject electrons from a metal whose work function is 4.1*10^-19J.

I converted the work function to electron volts and I know that hf = KE+W
and f=KE+W/h but where to I go from there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good start. The minimum frequency corresponds to KE=0. That is, the photon is just energetic enough to get the electron out of the metal, but not to give it any KE.
 
So is it just f=W/h I did that and got the wrong answer...and can you help me with another problem.

X-rays of wavelength 0.120nm are scattered from a carbon block. What is the compton wavelength shift for photons detected at the 45 and 180 degrees relative to the incident bean. I did wavelength` = wavelength +h/mc (1-cos theta) I did the problem both ways, solving for wavelength` and wavelength and got the answer wrong both times...any help?
 
supermenscher said:
So is it just f=W/h I did that and got the wrong answer...and can you help me with another problem.
If you got the wrong answer, then you must have done something wrong. Show your work and let's find out.

X-rays of wavelength 0.120nm are scattered from a carbon block. What is the compton wavelength shift for photons detected at the 45 and 180 degrees relative to the incident bean. I did wavelength` = wavelength +h/mc (1-cos theta) I did the problem both ways, solving for wavelength` and wavelength and got the answer wrong both times...any help?
Again, your methods seem OK to me. Show us the details of what you did.
 
For the first one I did f=W/h = 4.1*10^-19J (1/1.6*10^-19J)=2.565ev
f=2.565ev/6.626*10^-34=3.86710^33

For the second one, which wavelength do i solve for, wavelength` or wavelength because it says with respect to the incident beam
 
supermenscher said:
For the first one I did f=W/h = 4.1*10^-19J (1/1.6*10^-19J)=2.565ev
f=2.565ev/6.626*10^-34=3.86710^33
For some reason, you converted the work function from J to ev. Don't. The value of h that you used has units of Joule-sec.

For the second one, which wavelength do i solve for, wavelength` or wavelength because it says with respect to the incident beam
I will rewrite the Compton formula like this:
\lambda_f = \lambda_i + \frac{h}{m_e c} (1-cos\theta)

You are given the initial wavelength of the incident beam \lambda_i; solve for the final wavelength \lambda_f.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K