What is the minimum number of Polarizers needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter ah011
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the minimum number of polarizers required to reduce the intensity of polarized light to less than 9% of its original value after passing through multiple polarizers. The first polarizer is rotated 25° relative to the incident light, with each subsequent polarizer also rotated by 25° from the previous one. Participants suggest using the formula for intensity after each polarizer, which involves the cosine squared of the angles. There is confusion regarding the mention of 9 degrees, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the problem setup. The thread highlights the need for clarity in the arrangement of the polarizers to solve the intensity reduction challenge effectively.
ah011
Messages
5
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A polarized light is incident on several polarizing disks whose planes are parallel and centred on common axis. Suppose that the transmission axis of the first polarizer is rotated 25° relative to the axis of polarization of the incident light, and that the transmission axis of each additional analyzer is rotated 25° relative to the transmission axis of the previous one. What is the minimum number of polarizer needed (whole number), so the transmitted light through all polarizing sheets has an intensity that is less than 9% that striking the first polarizer?

Homework Equations


upload_2016-3-9_19-33-10.png


The Attempt at a Solution



Since the question is asking for the number of polarizers needed, you start by looking at 25 degrees take the cos^2(25). Then, since they are parallel and centered on a common axis it must be added to cos^2(25-9). I am not sure what to do after this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone reply this question is making me tear my hair out
 
Hint : Intensity after passing through one polarizer is I0cos2250, after the second, I0cos4250, ...Do you see a general formula for the intensity after passing through x polarizers?

Also, you typically don't want to be the first one to reply to your own thread. It is no longer visible in the 'Unanswered Threads' column, and people are less likely to visit this thread.
 
ah011 said:
Then, since they are parallel and centered on a common axis it must be added to cos^2(25-9).
That's a very strange conclusion. Where did you get the 9 degrees from? It makes me think you misunderstand the arrangement.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top