What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around frustrations with current documentary programming, particularly criticizing the History Channel's focus on sensational topics like time travel conspiracies instead of real historical content. Participants express disappointment over National Geographic's sale to Fox, fearing a decline in quality programming. The conversation shifts to lighter topics, including humorous anecdotes about everyday life, such as a malfunctioning kitchen fan discovered to be blocked by installation instructions. There are also discussions about the challenges of understanding various dialects in Belgium, the complexities of language, and personal experiences with weather and housing in California. Members share their thoughts on food, including a peculiar dish of zucchini pancakes served with strawberry yogurt, and delve into mathematical concepts related to sandwich cutting and the properties of numbers. The thread captures a blend of serious commentary and lighthearted banter, reflecting a diverse range of interests and perspectives among participants.
  • #451
ProfuselyQuarky said:
I was thinking of the name "jojo" as being cute :oldlaugh:
:smile: Me too! ironically "jojo" is the nickname I gave my wife in 1979, It's still her favorite. (I'm not really a 'tater hater either) Do you ever work with scratch board? It's one of my favorite mediums along with oils.
 
  • Like
Likes ProfuselyQuarky
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #452
fresh_42 said:
you don't need a BBQ. The usual unhealthy stuff will do.
This holds true with the exception of Barbecued Bison or elk backstrap, that stuffs so awesome it would make a vegan repent. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes ProfuselyQuarky
  • #453
How to scratch the universe : give a pencil and sheets of paper to a physics geek genius.
 
  • #454
1oldman2 said:
This holds true with the exception of Barbecued Bison or elk backstrap, that stuffs so awesome it would make a vegan repent. :wink:
At least me. Guess you have some advantages :cry: on location though.
 
  • Like
Likes ProfuselyQuarky and 1oldman2
  • #455
fresh_42 said:
At least me. Guess you have some advantages :cry: on location though.
Yeah, it sounds very 'Wyoming' to me.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #456
fresh_42 said:
Mustard seems to be good to lower the risk on developing some cancers. Nitrosamines can basically be found in all kinds of food that are salted and overheated, e.g. fries, crisps, steaks, and so on. you don't need a BBQ. The usual unhealthy stuff will do.
Oh, now I get it.
 
  • #457
If you go to google translate and put the word "the" alone and click the speaker to hear it, it pronounces it one way.

But if you write "the bird" and click the speaker to hear it, it pronounces the "the" in another way.

Now I'm really confused :confused:.
 
  • #458
Write this bird.
 
  • Like
Likes Sophia
  • #459
I don't know. It sounds different.
 
  • #460
English and pronunciation are two different things. Or as George Bernard Shaw put it: ##\text{ ghot }## is pronounced ##\text{ fish }##.
"gh" as in laugh, "o" as in women and "t" as in nation.
 
  • #461
Psinter said:
If you go to google translate and put the word "the" alone and click the speaker to hear it, it pronounces it one way.

But if you write "the bird" and click the speaker to hear it, it pronounces the "the" in another way.

Now I'm really confused :confused:.
There's a rule for pronouncing the based on beginning of the following word. I remember the lesson we were taught it because the most popular (and the strictest) teacher was covering our teacher that day. However, I don't remember the rule anymore :-/

The whole article stuff is so complicated. Like the list of things that always or never use "the". The only thing I'm sure about articles is deciding whether to use a or an (only in case someone tells me there should be one of these. That's a fourth grade exercise :-p). In all other cases, it's pure guessing for me :D
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Psinter
  • #462
Psinter said:
I don't know. It sounds different.
ðə / ðɪ
I pronounce it /ðɪ / even when it stands before a consonant. I think I am incorrect but /ðɪ/ is easier for me to pronounce and it sounds cuter and stronger. :wink: I have to beautify any things that are mine. bhuhahha
 
  • Like
Likes Psinter
  • #463
Psinter said:
If you go to google translate and put the word "the" alone and click the speaker to hear it, it pronounces it one way.

But if you write "the bird" and click the speaker to hear it, it pronounces the "the" in another way.

Now I'm really confused :confused:.
"The" you hear pronounced with a short E (kind of sounds like "ther") and a long E (like "thee"). I'd use the first one for "the fish" but the second for "the elephant", just because it flows better. Also there are regional and national differences, and even personal differences, in pronounciation in English. As with any other language I imagine.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2 and Psinter
  • #464
Ibix said:
"The" you hear pronounced with a short E (kind of sounds like "ther") and a long E (like "thee"). I'd use the first one for "the fish" but the second for "the elephant", just because it flows better. Also there are regional and national differences, and even personal differences, in pronounciation in English. As with any other language I imagine.
Yes, but it gets strange to weird, when one single person all of a sudden has two completely different names like Bernie Sænders and Bernie Sɑ:nders.
 
  • #465
fresh_42 said:
Yes, but it gets strange to weird, when one single person all of a sudden has two completely different names like Bernie Sænders and Bernie Sɑ:nders.
That's American regional pronounciation, which is extremely varied. Probably as a result of the country being settled by people from all over, I would guess.
 
  • #466
I know. But we (usually) try to pronounce names according to their origin. So Sa:nders simply sounds wrong, esp. if the 'a:::' gets longer and longer (Becky Anderson, CNN). And there is a mistake that almost all Germans make and which I hate as well. Esp. if made by speakers of the news who should know it better. We say Los eɪngeləs (... shiver ...). And of course there is this ugly effect due to many hours of practice of when, why, where etc. Very becomes wherry. A mistake I admit to recognize myself often when it's been too late.
 
  • #467
Oh, in English we just assimilate your words. Resistance is futile. The capital of Bavaria is Munich, isn't it?

To some extent I think people have trouble hearing some subtle differences. I learned Russian at school, and I remember the teacher endlessly trying to get us to pronounce the letter ы. He'd say it's not "uy", it's "uy" and we'd all look at him blankly. I was in my second year of studying it before I could even hear a difference between the two sounds he was making. The distinction isn't important in English and I couldn't hear them properly, let alone reproduce them. Similarly, the Scots get annoyed by the English tendency to pronounce loch as lock. Again, I think a lot of English don't hear the difference because the correct pronounciation uses a sound that doesn't appear in English.
 
  • #468
Sophia said:
There's a rule for pronouncing the based on beginning of the following word. I remember the lesson we were taught it because the most popular (and the strictest) teacher was covering our teacher that day. However, I don't remember the rule anymore :-/

The whole article stuff is so complicated. Like the list of things that always or never use "the". The only thing I'm sure about articles is deciding whether to use a or an (only in case someone tells me there should be one of these. That's a fourth grade exercise :-p). In all other cases, it's pure guessing for me :D
Probably like you, I took 11 years of English. And then a little more at university.

Never in all those years I was told any of what you have mentioned. I'm 100% sure of it. I was a good student and I'm more than sure I was never taught that.

English... I mean, look at this. The definitions are contradicting each other:
607.png

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

From what I can gather from Sophia's, Pepper Mint's, and Ibix's posts is that ordinarily, if the next word begins with a vowel, it is pronounced "thee" and if begins with a consonant it is pronounced "the".

Did I get it right?
 
  • Like
Likes Sophia
  • #469
Scots who speak English is a story by itself. I remember interviews with Amy Macdonald or John Higgins. I find it sounds a bit like we pronounce words. But I didn't get a word! I mean they eat fried Mars bars and haggis! (Sorry to all Scots who might read this.)
However, similar could be said about an interview with a Liverpool football player I once heard decades ago. I had trouble to determine it as English.

To remember the correct pronunciation of my famous whisky I built a bridge for myself: like-a-woman. Comes astonishingly close! Simply adjust the last syllable. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #470
Psinter said:
Did I get it right?
That would be too easy. I assume it is the same as with "a" and "an". It is an apple, theee apple, but a university, the university.
Correct this please, if wrong.
 
  • #471
I could go to the creek and wash my clothes, or I could go to the crick and warsh my clothes, It just depends on whom I'm speaking with.:smile: some people would say creak but that's a native american tribe.
 
  • #472
Ibix said:
The capital of Bavaria is Munich, isn't it?
Oh dear! I already had this debate with a friend of mine from NM. I think it started with Los Angeles, Venice, or was it Venice Beach or both ...
Many names of cities are simply translated or at least adopted. You say Munich, I München, you say (sorry for misspelling it here) Lundon, we say London and we both don't say Pari for Paris. I like John Cleese's suggestion to call Pittsburgh Pittsborough. I love his letter to America.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #473
fresh_42 said:
Many names of cities are simply translated or at least adopted. You say Munich, I München, you say (sorry for misspelling it here) Lundon, we say London and we both don't say Pari for Paris.
I just don't get the Munich thing, though. Mis-pronouncing Paris is one thing - I'm applying English pronunciation rules (such as they are) to a foreign word. I also get transliterating or dealing with sounds that don't exist in English. And total changes due to gunboat cartography.

But how do you get from München to Munich? OK, we dropped the umlaut. But how did the ending go missing? Where did the I come from? And why is the ch given a hardened sound when it is practically an sh in German?
 
  • #474
fresh_42 said:
I like John Cleese's suggestion to call Pittsburgh Pittsborough. I love his letter to America.
This is great, thanks for sharing. (I'm still laughing me arse off) < see right there spellcheck says I spelled ass wrong. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #475
Ibix said:
But how do you get from München to Munich?

For that matter, how did we get from Deutschland to Germany? That's even more puzzling.

I blame the Romans.
 
  • #476
This coul
collinsmark said:
I blame the Romans.
This could apply to a large percentage of the "Langauge barrier" recently discussed also.
Botched post, please disregard. :sorry:
 
Last edited:
  • #477
Ibix said:
But how do you get from München to Munich? OK, we dropped the umlaut. But how did the ending go missing? Where did the I come from? And why is the ch given a hardened sound when it is practically an sh in German?

I have no idea. An online etymology dictionary says the word itself comes from Mönch / monk. At least this reflects the relationship between both languages. Munich looks like a compromise between München and monk. As to the 'sh'. It's actually not quite a 'sh'. More of a cat's spit (not the human way of pretending, the actual noise). Do you remember how many different ways of a 'sh' the Russian have? Although I am able to pronounce them I found it difficult to distinguish them.

We (both) do similar things to Italian cities. Firenze became Florence / Florenz, Venezia Venice / Venedig and Roma Rome / Rom.
But nobody would ever change Southampton. To me it's a fascinating topic but I don't know even where to start reading about it.
 
  • #478
collinsmark said:
I blame the Romans.
This might apply to the "language barrier" recently discussed also.
 
  • #479
collinsmark said:
For that matter, how did we get from Deutschland to Germany? That's even more puzzling.

I blame the Romans.
That's correct, Sir. Germany comes from the Roman Germania whereas Deutschland is derived from the Teutons, one of the many Germanic tribes.
 
  • #480
1oldman2 said:
This might apply to the "language barrier" recently discussed also.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #481
It is never too late to study. I first attended university when I was 900 thousand years old. And look at me now. I'm a successful professional.

o0)

Edit: I should have put this in the lame jokes section. I don't know why I clicked here. :doh:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #482
1oldman2 said:
Do you ever work with scratch board? It's one of my favorite mediums along with oils.
Scratch board as in this? I've used it couple times, but decided that I prefer ink/graphite on paper better. The things that can be made with it are amazing, however. Oil is a great medium, but, unfortunately, the paint smells really bad until it's dried ?:)
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #483
zoobyshoe said:
Yeah, it sounds very 'Wyoming' to me.
Close enough, they have their fair share of Elk and Bison also. (Not to mention Grizzlies) :nb)
 
  • #484
ProfuselyQuarky said:
Scratch board as in this?
That is the stuff, Pen and ink is awesome too. I put up with the smell of oil paint as well as the thinner and retouch varnish, its a good trade off for the effects as well as the ability to come back after a couple days and still blend colors.
 
  • Like
Likes ProfuselyQuarky
  • #485
Skydiver becomes first person to jump and land without chute
https://www.yahoo.com/news/skydiver-becomes-first-person-jump-land-without-chute-070456645--spt.html

He was in the middle on one axis (of a 100 ft x 100 ft net), but he was about to one side with about 20-25 feet to spare on the other axis. I'm glad he made it since his wife and 4 year old son were there to watch. He apparently started around 25,000 ft.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #487
fresh_42 said:
That would be too easy. I assume it is the same as with "a" and "an". It is an apple, theee apple, but a university, the university.
Correct this please, if wrong.
When you finally get the pronunciation right you will probably hear coyotes howling or at least dog barking; you hit the right tone/note. Just like when Bieber sings.
 
  • #488
Psinter said:
It is never too late to study. I first attended university when I was 900 thousand years old. And look at me now. I'm a successful professional.

o0)

Edit: I should have put this in the lame jokes section. I don't know why I clicked here. :doh:

Soon, you will be 910 000 years old...
 
  • Like
Likes Psinter
  • #489
Season finale of Preacher was everything I hoped for.
 
  • #490
Psinter said:
...
From what I can gather from Sophia's, Pepper Mint's, and Ibix's posts is that ordinarily, if the next word begins with a vowel, it is pronounced "thee" and if begins with a consonant it is pronounced "the".

Did I get it right?
That rule might become truest to the British English speakers. Pronouncing [the] as either /ðə/ or /ðɪ/ when it stands before either a consonant or vowel I think is important but isn't more important than having a real skill to explain what you would really want to utter. And for example, you may be able to listen and understand well what people from Mexico or India/Bangladesh speak in English but personally I can't. Their intonation and pronunciation are very strange to me.
 
  • Like
Likes Psinter
  • #491
For some reason the batteries in my TV remote ended up being extremely hot. I checked and I had not left the
remote anywhere near any main source of heat like a lamp, kitchen. And it is not likely I had done so because the
remote is made of plastic and pretty likely would have melted. Still scratching my head.
 
  • #492
WWGD said:
Still scratching my head.
Someone used the transmission property of your remote for his own purposes. But the content of his additional transmissions got more and more boring right from the start, so he lost his interest and stopped transmitting.

You may now start to book your flights again. :cool:
 
  • #493
WWGD said:
For some reason the batteries in my TV remote ended up being extremely hot. I checked and I had not left the
remote anywhere near any main source of heat like a lamp, kitchen. And it is not likely I had done so because the
remote is made of plastic and pretty likely would have melted. Still scratching my head.
Sounds like something shorted inside. Does it still work?
 
  • #494
Jonathan Scott said:
Sounds like something shorted inside. Does it still work?
It works perfectly, thanks. And a day after the issue (I had removed the batteries , let them cool down and eventually reinserted them) batteries are at normal room temperature.
 
  • #495
WWGD said:
It works perfectly, thanks. And a day after the issue (I had removed the batteries , let them cool down and eventually reinserted them) batteries are at normal room temperature.
Is this rechargeable batteries or disposable (alkaline)? The higher internal resistance of alkaline batteries makes it hard for them to get particularly hot unless they are at least nearly being shorted, and also I wouldn't expect them to last very long when being nearly shorted. I have found a remote getting warm after leaving it in a pile of stuff such that a button was being pressed all the time, but I wouldn't call that "hot".
Rechargeables can get extremely (dangerously) hot when shorted or nearly shorted.
Edit: ... and rechargeables can also get hot of course when being charged rapidly.
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint
  • #496
Jonathan Scott said:
Is this rechargeable batteries or disposable (alkaline)? The higher internal resistance of alkaline batteries makes it hard for them to get particularly hot unless they are at least nearly being shorted, and also I wouldn't expect them to last very long when being nearly shorted. I have found a remote getting warm after leaving it in a pile of stuff such that a button was being pressed all the time, but I wouldn't call that "hot".
Rechargeables can get extremely (dangerously) hot when shorted or nearly shorted.
Edit: ... and rechargeables can also get hot of course when being charged rapidly.
Thanks for the followup. These are standard AA alkalines. I suspect , thank to your answer, that it may have been along the lines of what you said, leaving a button pressed for a while. Just double-checked and remote is working fine.
 
  • #497
I wonder, if others feel the same.
My motivation to answer questions (as far as I'm able to do so) is directly proportional to the effort made by the poster when questioning.
And of course, effort ## \neq ## length. Sometimes I catch myself to set threads on watch simply to see how others deal with posts, where it's hard to find any effort at all.
Am I old fashioned?
 
  • #498
The Perseid meteor shower is going to peak on the 12th of this month. Arrgggghhh. It would be incredible to see! It's best seen in the Northern Hemisphere and mid-southern latitudes...so maybe I've got a chance. :cool:

Anyone else enthusiastic about the awesomeness of this? Staying up past midnight to see a shower of meteors. What could be better?! :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes Sophia
  • #499
ProfuselyQuarky said:
Anyone else enthusiastic about the awesomeness of this? Staying up past midnight to see a shower of meteors. What could be better?! :biggrin:
You might need quite a bit of patience.

I saw some really great Perseids in about 1994, when I saw half a dozen bright ones going almost at the same time leaving bright trails across half of the sky. However, often it's a matter of waiting for minutes to see a little blip which you're not quite sure about, so you have to wait a few more minutes to see the next one. Most years I get to see at least one good one (turquoise tinged bright light and a bright trail lasting a few seconds).
 
  • #500
Jonathan Scott said:
You might need quite a bit of patience.

I saw some really great Perseids in about 1994, when I saw half a dozen bright ones going almost at the same time leaving bright trails across half of the sky. However, often it's a matter of waiting for minutes to see a little blip which you're not quite sure about, so you have to wait a few more minutes to see the next one. Most years I get to see at least one good one (turquoise tinged bright light and a bright trail lasting a few seconds).
I'm willing to be patient, even for one :) I live in place where light pollution makes it impossible to see anything in the sky, so this is an opportunity too good to lose.

Just started a thread for anyone who cares: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/hail-the-perseids.880813/
 

Similar threads

36
Replies
2K
Views
53K
Replies
3K
Views
156K
Replies
2K
Views
167K
Replies
4K
Views
231K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top