What is the Phase Constant for a Simple Harmonic Oscillator with Given Graphs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter foundAnAnswer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Phase
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the phase constant of a simple harmonic oscillator using its position and velocity graphs. The position function is given as x(t) = xmcos(ωt + ϕ) and the velocity function as v(t) = -ωxmsin(ωt + ϕ). The user initially attempted to equate the position and velocity values at t=0 but encountered confusion. Ultimately, they found that using the ratio of velocity to position, adjusted for angular frequency, led to the correct phase constant calculation. The final answer for the phase constant was determined to be approximately 1.01 radians after accounting for the phase shift.
foundAnAnswer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Part (a) of the figure below is a partial graph of the position function x(t) for a simple harmonic oscillator with an angular frequency of 1.35 rad/s; Part (b) of the figure is a partial graph of the corresponding velocity function v(t). The vertical axis scales are set by xs = 6.5 cm and vs = 7.0 cm/s. What is the phase constant of the SHM if the position function x(t) is given by the form x = xmcos(ωt + ϕ)?

15-20.gif


Homework Equations


x = xmcos(ωt + ϕ)
v = -ωxmsin(ωt + ϕ)

The Attempt at a Solution



For the X vs. t graph the line crosses t=0 when x = 2.6. For the V vs. t graph the line crosses t=0 when v=-5.6.

I thought then I could just plug all the number in and find out when they are equal

2.6 = 6.5cos(1.35*0+ϕ)
-5.6 = -8.775sin(1.35*0+ϕ)

I subtracted 2.6 from both sides for the first equation and added 5.6 to both sides for the second. I then set them equal. I used my calculator to attempt to solve them.

Looking at them separately it looks like it should be 1.15 radians for X and .69 radians for V (Roughly).

I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. Perhaps I shouldn't be reading the graph like I am. or I am simply reading it wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found an answer. I don't understand why this is correct, but dividing velocity by position gives the following

v/x = tan-1(\frac{Velocity @ t=0}{Position @ t=0 TIMES Angular Frequency})

So that leaves


tan-1(\frac{-5.6}{2.6 * 1.35}) = -1.01

I think then since it is shifted I changed it to positive 1.01.

That answer was taken as correct.
 
One equation represents position and the other represents velocity. Since the units are different, you can never "set them equal."
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top