What is the point of convergence for a recursive sequence in a plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter toothpaste666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
toothpaste666
Messages
516
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement



Let \{P_i\}_{i=0}^\infty be a sequence of points on a plane. Suppose P_is are placed as on the picture below, so that |P_0 P_1|=2, |P_1 P_2|=1, |P_2 P_3|=.5, |P_3P_4|=.25, ... Find the coordinate of the point P = \lim_{i→\infty} P_i

attachment.php?attachmentid=68646&d=1397459162.png


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



here are the points P_0: (0,0) P_1: (2,0) P_2: (2, 1) P_3: (1.5, 1) P_4: (1.5, .75) P_5: (1.625, .75)

lets examine the x values first:
2, 1.5, 1.625

this is a sequence defined recursively by:

a_1 = 2

a_{n+1} = 2 - \frac{a_n}{4}

L = \lim_{a_n\rightarrow\infty} a_n = \lim_{a_n\rightarrow\infty} a_{n+1} <br /> = \lim_{an\rightarrow\infty} 2-\frac{a_n}{4}

which means that

L = 2-\frac{L}{4}

4L = 8 - L

5L = 8

L = \frac{8}{5}

L = 1.6

so 1.6 would be the x coordinate of the point.

I then would follow a similar process to find the y coordinate, but before I do that I just want to make sure what I have so far is correct.
 

Attachments

  • seriesproblem.png
    seriesproblem.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 501
Physics news on Phys.org
also forgive me for not proving the sequence is bounded and decreasing (I left it out to save time and narrow the focus) but i have done so by mathematical induction
 
Yes it is correct but also prove it is bounded and decreasing.
 
Ok so it turns out one of my induction proofs was wrong. I can prove it is bounded but this sequence is not strictly increasing or decreasing. it hops back and forth between increasing and decreasing but it IS approaching a certain point. Is there any way to prove that it has a limit?
 
the proof that it is bounded:

1 ≤ a_n ≤ 2

\frac{1}{4} ≤ \frac{a_n}{4} ≤ \frac{2}{4}

-\frac{1}{4} ≥ -\frac{a_n}{4} ≥ -\frac{2}{4}

2-\frac{1}{4} ≥ 2-\frac{a_n}{4} ≥ 2-\frac{2}{4}

1.75 ≥ a_{n+1} ≥ 1.5

1 ≤ 1.5 ≤ a_{n+1} ≤ 1.75 ≤ 2

1 ≤ a_{n+1} ≤ 2
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top