What is the purpose of grounding a conductor?

Thread starter Domnu
Start date Sep 17, 2008
Tags

Potential

AI Thread Summary

Grounding a conductor establishes its electrical potential at 0 V, meaning it is at the same potential as the ground. This is significant because potential is defined by the difference between two points, and grounding ensures that the conductor is at a neutral reference point. Grounding helps prevent electrical shock and protects equipment from voltage surges. It also plays a critical role in circuit safety and stability. Overall, grounding is essential for maintaining safe electrical systems.

Sep 17, 2008

Domnu

This is more of a general question... if a particular conductor is grounded, all this means is that the potential of the conductor is 0 V, right?

Physics news on Phys.org

Sep 17, 2008

Redbelly98

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Insights Author

Pretty much. Since potential relates to the difference between two places, it means that conductor is 0V relative to ground, i.e. at the same potential as ground.

Thread 'I've come across another fluid pressure problem I don't understand'

Neglect gravity other than that of water; neglect friction. F1=ρgsh=1000*10*1*(1+4)=50000 N; F1=ρgsh=1000*10*0.1*4=4000 N; F3=50000-4000=46000 N?

View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

View full post »

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

View full post »