What is the relationship between energy and mass in a two-particle collision?

AI Thread Summary
In a two-particle collision, the invariant mass squared (M²) is expressed as M² = (E1 + E2)² - (p1 + p2)², where E represents energy and p represents momentum. The equation incorporates the masses of the particles and their energies, with E being defined as mc², using c = 1 for simplification. A key point of discussion is the dot product of momentum vectors, specifically how to derive the term p1 ⋅ p2 from the expansion of (p1 + p2)². The algebraic expansion reveals that (p1 + p2)² includes terms for the individual momenta and their dot product. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing energy and mass in particle collisions.
Guaicai
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a two-particle collision the square of the invariant mass is.
M is total mass of the system (M2 is the square of the total mass)
m is the mass of each particles
E is the energy of each particles
p is momentum vector of eache particles

Homework Equations


M2 = (E1+E2)2 - (p1+p2)2 = m12+m22+2(E1E2 - p1 ⋅ p2)

now know the each energy E = mc2, here set the c =1 (Speed of Light),

The Attempt at a Solution


But how the momentum have dot product in this equation ? How the dot product p1 ⋅ p2 can derive from (p1+p2)2 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Guaicai said:
But how the momentum have dot product in this equation ? How the dot product p1 ⋅ p2 can derive from (p1+p2)2 ?
Try doing the algebra... hint: expand the brackets.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Try doing the algebra... hint: expand the brackets.
Yeah , i was tried to deriving (p1+p2)2 to the single dot product as above ,but always have the extra term.
(p1+p2)2
=p12+p22+2p1p2
=p12+p22+( p1 ⋅ p2 )
 
Guaicai said:
Yeah , i was tried to deriving (p1+p2)2 to the single dot product as above ,but always have the extra term.
(p1+p2)2
=p12+p22+2p1p2
=p12+p22+( p1 ⋅ p2 )
What is the relationship between E1 and m1?
 
  • Like
Likes Simon Bridge
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top