What is the relationship between net work and net heat flow for a gas?

AI Thread Summary
The net work done on a gas is 55J, while the net heat flow into the gas is -23J, indicating that 23J of energy has exited the system. The work done by the gas is calculated as -55J, which reflects the conservation of energy principle. The first law of thermodynamics, expressed as ΔU = q - w, helps clarify that energy entering the system is positive, while work done on the system is negative. The negative heat flow signifies energy leaving the system rather than being conserved. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing energy balances in steady-state operations.
brake4country
Messages
216
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


The net work done on a certain gas is 55J, and the net heat flow into the gas is -23J. What is the net work done by the gas?

Homework Equations


U = q + w

The Attempt at a Solution


This problem seems very conceptual so I didn't use the formula above. I just deduced from this question that if the work done on a gas is 55J, then the work done by the gas is -55J. This is the correct answer but I got thrown off by the -23 J of net heat flow. What does this -23 really mean if the work done by the gas (-55J) is conserved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first law of thermodynamics is usually expressed as Δu = q - w. Where energy put into the system is considered positive and work put into the system is considered negative. I don't know what convention your textbook is using, but if the above equation you posted is from your textbook, then heat in is considered positive and work in is considered positive.

All that -23J means is that 23 joules of energy went out of the system. In this case, nothing is really "conserved", it's just +55 Joule done on the system = -55 Joule done by the system and -23 Joule heat into the system = 23 Joule heat out of the system. This law is really useful when considering "steady state" operation of systems where ΔU = 0, that's where you will need to do energy balances.
 
  • Like
Likes brake4country
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top