What is the relationship between the maginitude of the radial electric field an

AI Thread Summary
The relationship between the magnitude of a radial electric field and its associated potential is defined by the equation E(r) = -dV(r)/dr, indicating that the electric field is the negative gradient of the electric potential. The discussion emphasizes that as a positive test charge moves from a point of higher potential to lower potential, the work done is negative, aligning with this equation. Participants clarify the calculus involved, noting that the electric field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance, while potential is inversely proportional to the distance itself. The correct choice for the relationship is confirmed to be E(r) = -dV(r)/dr. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving problems related to electric fields and potentials.
physicsmad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the relationship between the magnitude of a radial electric field and and its associated potential? Choose the correct general relationship?


Homework Equations



The following alternatives are given:
a) E(r)= dV(r)/dr
b) E(r)= V(r)/r
c) E(r)= -dV(r)/dr
d) E(r)= -V(r)/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the electric field is proportional to the inverse of (r^2) and the potential is proportional to the inverse of (r). My problem lies in understanding the calculus of the above formulas. Can anyone guide me through them please?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, physicsMad!
Think of any electric field, not necessarily the one from a point charge.
You have a tiny test charge q that you want to push from point A to point B. A is considered to have an electric potential of zero volts. What is the potential at B? By definition it is the work done (energy given) per unit charge to move q from A to B. So work is W = F*r where r is the distance or, since the F = qE may well be changing as you go,
dW = F*dr = qE*dr for each little increment in distance dr
The potential is the work done per charge or
dV = dW/q = E*dr
You can turn this around to get E = dV/dr.
 
Thank you for the kind welcome Delphi51.

I can now understand much better than before due to your explanation. I really appreciate it. However, i forgot to mention that the point charge has positive charge. So, the work would be negative the change occurs from higher potential to lower potential. Am I on the right track? If my thinking is correct, I would choose equation E(r)= -dV(r)/r.

Thanks again :-)
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top