What is the scale of lengths on diagrams for a ripple tank?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ellieee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagrams Scale
AI Thread Summary
The scale in the diagrams for the ripple tank is clarified, with Fig 1.1 indicating "not to scale" and Fig 1.2 providing a scale applicable only to the lower diagram. The scale shows that a distance matching the tick marks represents an actual length of 4 cm, indicating a reduction in size on paper. The top of the page measures about 20 cm, allowing the 4 cm segment to fit over five times along that edge, confirming the reduction scale. Overall, the real dimensions of the ripple tank and wave valleys are larger than depicted in the diagrams.
ellieee
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
does the scale mean that 2cm on paper = 4cm in real life / as answer ? I measured the yellow line to be 2cm, which would mean 4cm as answer right?
but then for question ci, when asked to calculate wavelength, answer is 2cm.
Relevant Equations
measuring wavelength only
Question 05-04-2021 20.50_edit_28400261148791.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The scale (circled in orange) is not part of Fig 1.1 (top).

Fig 1.1 specifically says "not to scale".

The scale (circled in orange) is part of Fig 1.2 (bottom).
 
The scale shown applies to the lower diagram only. Any distance in the lower diagram that matches the distance between the two tick marks on the scale would represent an actual distance of 4 cm.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, DaveC426913 and ellieee
The scale means that the representation on paper of the ripple tank is smaller than its real dimensions.

The top of the page is about 20 cm wide and that segment of line representing 4 cm can be placed more than five times along that edge of the sheet; therefore, this scale is a reduction scale, which proportion is the length of that represented segment divided by the actual length of 4 cm.

The real life ripple tank and the distances among valleys of the waves are bigger in real life than represented on paper.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...

Similar threads

Back
Top