What is the solution for a system of ODEs with a matrix coefficient?

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6
I know how to solve \frac{d\vec{u}}{dt} = A\vec{u}, I was just watching a lecture, and the lecturer related that solving that equation is pretty much a direct analogy to \vec{u} = e^{At}\vec{u}(0), in so far as all we need to do after that is understand exactly what it means to take the exponential of a matrix, which is fine...

My question is this, do I solve \frac{d^2\vec{u}}{dt^2} = A\vec{u} with \vec{u}=A^{-1}e^{At}\frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}(0)?

edit:

OR do I need to go along the lines

\frac{d^2\vec{u}}{dt^2} = \lambda^2\vec{u} = A\vec{u}

and solve

(A - \lambda^2 I)\vec{u}=\vec{0}

?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One way to look at it: Introduce a new function v: \frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}= \vec{v}, \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}=A\vec{u}.
 
kostoglotov said:
I know how to solve \frac{d\vec{u}}{dt} = A\vec{u}, I was just watching a lecture, and the lecturer related that solving that equation is pretty much a direct analogy to \vec{u} = e^{At}\vec{u}(0), in so far as all we need to do after that is understand exactly what it means to take the exponential of a matrix, which is fine...

My question is this, do I solve \frac{d^2\vec{u}}{dt^2} = A\vec{u} with \vec{u}=A^{-1}e^{At}\frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}(0)?

edit:

OR do I need to go along the lines

\frac{d^2\vec{u}}{dt^2} = \lambda^2\vec{u} = A\vec{u}

and solve

(A - \lambda^2 I)\vec{u}=\vec{0}

?
I haven't thought about this in quite a while.
If you had a regular ODE of the form u' = au, or u' - au = 0, the characteristic equation would be r - a = 0, so the solution would be u = Ceat, similar to your first order example above.

If you had u'' = λ2u, or u'' - λ2u = 0, the characteristic equation would be r2 - λ2 = 0, or r = ±λ. The solution would be u = C1eλt + C2e-λt.

Your example, with a system of ODEs, will have a solution that is analogous to the above, with exponentials involving the matrix.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top