What is the solution to the Tricky Collision Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jj2443
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
jj2443
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small hard block of mass 3m is suspended from a thread of length L. A second block of mass m is located on an incline, originally at rest, a height y above the level of the large mass. When the smaller block is released it slides, without friction, down the ramp, and then collides elastically with the larger block. The large block swings around so that the tension in the string just barely drops to zero at the top of the loop. The small block slides back up the ramp, rising to a maximum vertical height h.

Homework Equations


conservation of momentum: pi=pf
p=mv

The Attempt at a Solution


...help to get started please!??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Drawing a picture is always a good way to start.
 
I've done a picture, and have a basic understanding that I should use conservation of energy to find velocity of the block at bottom of incline. Then I need conservation of momentum in an elastic collision to find velocity of ball on string...(?) How does this help me find the new h and the L?
 
So you know the KE of both objects before the collision, and you want to know the KE of both objects after the collision. There's two unknowns, so you'll need two equations. You got one, which comes from the conservation of momentum. What's the other equation? (Hint: It comes from the fact that the collision is elastic)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top