What is the speed of a piece of a spaceship that blew up?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oneamp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spaceship Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the conservation of momentum after a spaceship explosion. The initial momentum of the spaceship is calculated, and the momenta of the two known pieces are determined. The challenge arises in calculating the velocity of the third piece, with emphasis on correctly applying the signs for momentum since one piece moves backward. The importance of treating momentum as a vector quantity is highlighted, suggesting that the direction of each piece's velocity must be considered. Ultimately, the correct approach involves ensuring that the total initial momentum equals the sum of the momenta of all three pieces.
oneamp
Messages
219
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spaceship of mass 2.30×106kg is cruising at a speed of 5.50×106m/s when the antimatter reactor fails, blowing the ship into three pieces. One section, having a mass of 5.20×105kg , is blown straight backward with a speed of 2.30×106m/s . A second piece, with mass 8.40×105kg , continues forward at 1.30×106m/s .


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Using mv=p, I calculated p of each piece like this:
p1 = 1.196*10^12
p2 = 1.092*10^12
p_total = 1.265*10^13

Then I found p3 by subtracting p2+p1 from p_total.

I divided p3 by the mass of the mystery piece: p/940,000 = 1.0302*10^13

But... the answer was wrong. I also tried subtracting: p1-p2 =pt and working from there. What am I doing wrong?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is a vector. You need to add the three momenta (after explosion) as vectors. Here, in 1D, be careful with the signs. A diagram may help.
 
But it's not 1D, right? Because one goes forward, one goes back, and the mystery piece I am solving for goes off in an unspecified direction...
 
I got it, thanks for that tip.
 
I believe you are right in using the conservation of momentum to tackle this problem. The initial momentum should equal the final momentum of the combined three pieces, such that

pinitial = p1 + p2 + p3

m(total)v = m1v1 + m2v2 + m3v3

p(total) = (2.3x106kg)(5.50 x 106m/s) = (1.265x1013)

p1 = (5.20×105kg)(-2.30×106m/s) = (-1.20x1012)

p2 = (8.40×105kg)(1.30×106m/s) = (1.092x1012)

p3 = (9.4x105kg) v3

Because the first piece was blown backwards, it becomes important to apply the negative to its velocity component, and should look like,

(1.265x1013) = (-1.20x1012) + (1.092x1012) + (9.4x105kg)(v3)

It becomes simple to solve for v3 . I assume the sign was causing your problem in the calculations. The mass of the third piece was found by the missing mass, m(total) = m1 + m2 + m3

Because the problem doesn't specify, i took the assumption that the collision only occurs in a single direction, along the x-axis, and that the velocity of each piece doesn't have to be broken down into individual x- and y-components.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top