What is the speed of the spaceship as measured by Joe?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a spaceship as observed by Joe, who measures the time it takes for the spaceship to pass by. Moe measures the spaceship's length at 350 meters, but Joe's observation requires accounting for relativistic effects, specifically length contraction. The correct approach involves using the Lorentz contraction formula to find the length as perceived by Joe and then calculating speed using the contracted length and the time measured by Joe. After adjustments and corrections, the final speed calculated is approximately 0.988 times the speed of light, aligning with expectations for high-speed scenarios. The importance of using consistent reference frames in relativity is emphasized throughout the discussion.
SuperNova1
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Moe measure the length of his spaceship as 350 m. Joe observes this spaceship as it flies by his position and measures that it took 0.700 s to pass through. What is the speed of the spaceship?

l': the length of the spaceship as measured by MOE = 350m
t: the time as measured by JOE = .7 x10^-6

Homework Equations


i'm not positive on the equations obviously speed = distance/time won't work as joe will not measure the length of the spaceship the same as moe will
i found an equation on the relativity of length and how it changes in relation to the observer outside the moving object which was ... change in t1 = L'/(c-u)
but I'm not too sure whether it's anywhere close to the correct equation

The Attempt at a Solution


i tried distance/time 350/.7*10^-6 = 5*10^8 which can't be right for obvious reasons as the spaceship cannot travel faster than the speed of light
then i tried 0.7*10^-6 = 350/3*10^8 - u
350 = 0.7*10^-6(3*10^8 - u)
350/.7*10-6= 3*10^8 - u
5*10^8 - 3*10^8 = -u
u = -2*10^8
and this answer doesn't look good either
thank you to anyone who can help
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You appear to be using length as measured in one reference frame (Moe's) and time as measured in another (Joes's). You can't use those together.

What you can do, I think, is this- let v be Moe's speed relative to Joe. Then the length as measured in Joe's reference frame is 350/\sqrt{1- v^2/c^2}. Now, you can say that "speed" is "distance divided y time"- v= 350/.7\sqrt{1- v^2/c^2}= 500/\sqrt{1- v^2} so that v\sqrt{1- v^/c^2}= 350. Solve that for v.
 


HallsofIvy said:
You appear to be using length as measured in one reference frame (Moe's) and time as measured in another (Joes's). You can't use those together.

What you can do, I think, is this- let v be Moe's speed relative to Joe. Then the length as measured in Joe's reference frame is 350/\sqrt{1- v^2/c^2}. Now, you can say that "speed" is "distance divided y time"- v= 350/.7\sqrt{1- v^2/c^2}= 500/\sqrt{1- v^2} so that v\sqrt{1- v^/c^2}= 350. Solve that for v.

The spaceship from Joe's view contracts. You have it expanding. (Lorentz contraction).
Just multiply 350m by √(1 - v2/c2) instead of dividing.

So the idea is: compute the length of the spaceship as measured by Joe, divide by Joe's time, and that will give the (contracted) length as seen by Joe.
 


Thank you for all your help guys i did it again and got a value of 0.988c or 2.994*10^8 which sounds right to me as the lecturer told us it was close to the speed of light, thank you again
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top