What is the spring constant for the bungee cord used in the given scenario?

AI Thread Summary
To find the spring constant for the bungee cord, the discussion emphasizes using energy conservation principles, specifically equating gravitational potential energy with elastic potential energy. The jumper's motion consists of a free-fall segment followed by simple harmonic oscillation, which complicates the calculation of the spring constant. One participant suggests that the angular frequency formula could simplify the process, while another clarifies that kinetic energy does not need to be involved in determining the spring constant. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying the energy equations to arrive at the correct value for k. Ultimately, the focus remains on finding an accurate method to calculate the spring constant based on the jumper's dynamics.
Bryson Stevens
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 84.0-kg bungee jumper steps off a bridge with a light bungee cord tied to her and to the bridge. The unstretched length of the cord is 15.0 m. The jumper reaches reaches the bottom of her motion 38.0 m below the bridge before bouncing back. We wish to find the time interval between her leaving the bridge and her arriving at the bottom of her motion. Her overall motion can be separated into an 15.0-m free-fall and a 23.0-m section of simple harmonic oscillation.

Homework Equations


KE = 1/2mv^2
Uk = 1/2kx^2
f = 1/2pi sqrt(k/m)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have already determined the amount of time the jumper spends in free fall using basic kinematics. My question is how to calculate the spring constant. Is there a way to pull the angular frequency out of this situation, if so the equation f = 1/2pi sqrt(k/m) would make it easy, or do you have to use the various energies 1/2mv^2 and 1/2kx^2 to find the spring constant?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bryson Stevens said:
do you have to use the various energies 1/2mv^2 and 1/2kx^2 to find the spring constant?

Yes, this would be the most direct way of obtaining the spring constant k. Have you tried this?
 
I tried that by setting the kinetic energy due to gravity equal to the potential energy in the spring and did not get the correct answer.
 
What was your value of k? Can you show us your working?
 
Bryson Stevens said:
I tried that by setting the kinetic energy due to gravity equal to the potential energy in the spring and did not get the correct answer.
You don't need involve KE at all to find k.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top