What is the stopping potential for a wavelength of 230nm?

Wardlaw
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Modern Physics question!

Homework Statement



When radiation of wavelength 350nm is incident on a surface, the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons is 1.2ev. What is the stopping potential for a wavelength of 230nm?

Homework Equations


\phi=hc/\lambda-eV0( V0= V 'nought')
I am unsure as to what other equations can be used.


The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt was to calculate \phi for the 350nm wavelength, and then do the same for the 230nm wavelength.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


in this problem you can make use of two equations:
(1) : Kmax = hc/lamda - workfunction (Kmax is the max. kinetic energy , lamda is the wavelength)

(2) : Kmax = eVs (Vs is the stopping potential)


your start is good .. when you get the work function for the 350 nm wavelength , use that workfunction again with equation (1) along with the 230 nm wavelength to get Kmax and then use equation (2) to get the stopping potential ..

note : you just need to calculate the workfunction just once since that value is fixed for a certain material .. :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top