What is the value of r given the change in electric potential?

AI Thread Summary
The electric potential at a distance r from a positive point charge is initially 45V and increases to 50V when the distance decreases by 1.5m. The correct value of r is determined to be 15m. The discussion emphasizes using the equation V=(1/4∏ε) q/r and suggests taking the ratio of potentials to simplify the problem. Participants provide algebraic guidance to eliminate unknowns and solve for r. The final consensus confirms that the calculated answer is mathematically sound.
mrcotton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
The electric potential at a distance r from a positive point charge is 45V. The potential
increases to 50 V when the distance from the charge decreases by 1.5 m. What is the
value of r?

A 1.3m
B 1.5m
C 7.9m
D 15m

Homework Statement



the answer is D

Homework Equations


V=(1/4∏ε) q/r
v proportional to 1/r

The Attempt at a Solution


5=(q/(1/4∏ε))*((1/r-1.5)-(1/r))

How embarrassing I just can’t get my head around this one. Am I setting the equation up correct to solve.
If I have I need desperate help with the algebra.
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org


mrcotton said:
The electric potential at a distance r from a positive point charge is 45V. The potential
increases to 50 V when the distance from the charge decreases by 1.5 m. What is the
value of r?

A 1.3m
B 1.5m
C 7.9m
D 15m

Homework Statement



the answer is D

Homework Equations


V=(1/4∏ε) q/r
v proportional to 1/r

The Attempt at a Solution


5=(q/(1/4∏ε))*((1/r-1.5)-(1/r))

How embarrassing I just can’t get my head around this one. Am I setting the equation up correct to solve.
If I have I need desperate help with the algebra.
Thank you
You have one equation and two unknowns.

Taking the ratio \displaystyle \ \ \frac{V(r)}{V(r-1.5)}\ \ might be more helpful.

Otherwise, use your equation along with \displaystyle \ \ V(r)=45=\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0\,r}\ \ then eliminate q & solve for r.
 


You're going to want to get rid of the constants you don't have values for (like the charge value q) so you'll probably want to set it up as a ratio so that they'll cancel out.

EDIT: SammyS got their first!
 


Thank you guys.
I did it like this with your help.
Is this mathematicaly sound.
Thanks
Mr C
electrostaic_zpsf9de5785.jpg
 


mrcotton said:
Thank you guys.
I did it like this with your help.
Is this mathematically sound.
Thanks
Mr C
attachment.php?attachmentid=54562&stc=1&d=1357706512.jpg
That answer is correct.
 

Attachments

  • electrostaic_zpsf9de5785.jpg
    electrostaic_zpsf9de5785.jpg
    4.8 KB · Views: 1,449
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top