What Type of Gas Can Be Used for Isothermal and Adiabatic Energy Storage?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on gas types for isothermal and adiabatic energy storage, participants analyze the behavior of an ideal gas during expansion and compression processes. The gas's pressure changes indicate it could be diatomic, as a gamma value of 1.4 aligns with diatomic gases. The translational kinetic energy of the gas is expected to increase, but clarity on specific calculations is sought. Participants express confusion about determining the gas type and the relevance of internal energy changes in this context. Understanding gamma and its derivation is highlighted as essential for identifying the gas type accurately.
Claire84
Messages
218
Reaction score
0
We've been set the question of- In an isothermal expansion, and ideal gas at initial pressure Po expands until its volume is twice its initial volume. When the gas is compressed adibatically and quasi-statically ack to its original volume, its pressure is 1.32Po. Is the gas monatomic, diatomic or polyatomic? How does the translational kinetic energy of the gas change in these processes? We can assume throughout that the gas is in the regime where rotational motion takes plae, but vibraional motion is frozen out.

I wouldnhave said that the translational minietic energy increased throughout, but how specific would I need to be really? Also, I have no idea about what type of gas it is. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a monatomic gas I know that the change in internal energy is equal to 3/2nRchange in temp and for diatomic it's 5/2nRchange in T (I think), so do I need to look at the various internal energies to decide what type of gas it is or is there a much simpler solution? I've been looking at loads of textbooks but to no avail and my brain is completely fried because it's obviously not a hard question.
 
Is it a diatomic gas because when you work out gamma for the adiabatic process you get 1.4? I just checked this at a website and stuff, but I never knew that gamma would equal this for a diatomic gas. Is this something you should know or is there some way of deriving it?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top