What's my mistake in this problem in dynamics involving pulleys?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the correct accelerations of two blocks connected by pulleys, where the initial calculations were incorrect. Block B experiences a gravitational force of 5g, but the tension in the strings must be accounted for, leading to a net force equation that includes both gravity and tension. The participants emphasize the importance of setting up force equations for each block and recognizing that the accelerations of the blocks are related due to the constraints of the string. Ultimately, the correct accelerations are derived from understanding the relationship between the lengths of the strings and the movements of the blocks. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the learning gained from solving pulley problems.
Adesh
Messages
735
Reaction score
191
Homework Statement
Find the acceleration of block A and block B.
Relevant Equations
$F=ma$.
Find the acceleration of block A and B, given that the mass of pulleys and strings are negligible.
WhatsApp Image 2020-07-08 at 7.54.27 PM.jpeg
. I could see that the block B has gravity acting on it, therefore the gravitational force on the block ##B## is ##F_B = 5 g## and hence the acceleration is ##g##. From the pulley to which block B is connected there goes two strings, therefore tension on each string will be half of ##F_B##, therefore the force on the block ##A## is ##F_A = \frac{F_B}{2} = \frac{5g}{2}## and therefore the acceleration of the block ##A## is ##\frac{5g}{4}##. Unfortunately, my answers are wrong, the correct answers are ##\text{acceleration of block A}= \frac{2}{7} g## and ##\text{acceleration of block B}= \frac{g}{7}##.

Can somebody please tell me what's my mistake without just giving out the whole complete solution?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Adesh said:
I could see that the block B has gravity acting on it, therefore the gravitational force on the block ##B## is ##F_B = 5 g## and hence the acceleration is ##g##.
The string also exerts an upward force on block B (effectively), so its acceleration is not simply g. (It would be in free fall if it were.)

Set up force equations for each block.
 
  • Like
Likes Frigus, Adesh and Lnewqban
Further to @Doc Al's point, this is also wrong:
Adesh said:
therefore tension on each string will be half of ##F_B##
If that were the tension in the string then mass B would not fall.
 
  • Like
Likes Frigus, Delta2 and Adesh
Okay, let the tensions in the strings connected to the pulley of block B be ##T_1## on each string. So, net force on block ##B## is ##F_{net}= 5g - 2T_1##. And therefore, the force on block A is ##F= T_1##.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and Delta2
Adesh said:
Homework Statement:: Find the acceleration of block A and block B.
Relevant Equations:: $F=ma$.

the correct answers are acceleration of block A=27g and acceleration of block B=g7.
Please check again that correct answers are not 2/7g(downward) and g/7(upwards) but 10/13g(forward) and 5/13g(downwards).🙂
 
  • Like
Likes Adesh
Adesh said:
Okay, let the tensions in the strings connected to the pulley of block B be ##T_1## on each string. So, net force on block ##B## is ##F_{net}= 5g - 2T_1##. And therefore, the force on block A is ##F= T_1##.
Now you can use constraint motion equations to find relation between block a and b acceleration.
 
Hemant said:
Please check again that correct answers are not 2/7g(downward) and g/7(upwards) but 10/13g(forward) and 5/13g(downwards).🙂
Oh sorry.
 
  • Like
Likes Frigus
Adesh said:
Oh sorry.
No problem.👍
 
  • Like
Likes Adesh
@haruspex What should I do after post #4?
 
  • #10
Adesh said:
@haruspex What should I do after post #4?
Write the ΣF=ma equation for each mass, and the kinematic equation relating the two accelerations.
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
Write the ΣF=ma equation for each mass, and the kinematic equation relating the two accelerations.
For block B
$$
5g-2T_1= 5a_B $$
For block A
$$
T_1= 2a_A$$
Please explain me as I have no reason to believe that block A and B will have same acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #12
Adesh said:
For block B
$$
5g-2T_1= 5a_B $$
For block A
$$
T_1= 2a_A$$
Please explain me as I have no reason to believe that block A and B will have same acceleration.
You are right...they don't have same acceleration.
Try to find relationship between their acceleration.
Study constraint motion equation ,they just require 10 minutes to understand and you will have new tool to solve pulley problems.
 
  • #13
Adesh said:
For block B
$$
5g-2T_1= 5a_B $$
For block A
$$
T_1= 2a_A$$
Please explain me as I have no reason to believe that block A and B will have same acceleration.
Remember that the length of the string is constant. Write that as an equation relating the lengths of the different sections of string, and differentiate twice.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Adesh and Frigus
  • #14
haruspex said:
Remember that the length of the string is constant. Write that as an equation relating the lengths of the different sections of string, and differentiate twice.
Let the length of the string from block A to the first pullet is ##l_1## and then from this pulley to the second pulley(to which block B is connected) is ##l_2##. Length of string from block B to the pulley on right is ##l_3## and the last segment is ##l_4##. What should I do next?
 
  • #15
Adesh said:
Let the length of the string from block A to the first pullet is ##l_1## and then from this pulley to the second pulley(to which block B is connected) is ##l_2##. Length of string from block B to the pulley on right is ##l_3## and the last segment is ##l_4##. What should I do next?
Two of those are necessarily the same.
The sum is constant. What do you get if you differentiate that twice?
 
  • #16
haruspex said:
Two of those are necessarily the same.
The sum is constant. What do you get if you differentiate that twice?
Yeah, I think ##l_2 = l_3##. As the sum is constant, the first derivative (with time) will be zero, so will be the second derivative (with respect to time) . That is
$$
\frac{d^2}{dt^2} \left(l_1 +2 l_2+l_4\right) = 0 $$
 
  • #17
Adesh said:
Yeah, I think ##l_2 = l_3##. As the sum is constant, the first derivative (with time) will be zero, so will be the second derivative (with respect to time) . That is
$$
\frac{d^2}{dt^2} \left(l_1 +2 l_2+l_4\right) = 0 $$
Ok.
How do those derivatives relate to the accelerations of the blocks?
 
  • #18
haruspex said:
Ok.
How do those derivatives relate to the accelerations of the blocks?
Okay, blocks should move as to maintain the length of strings, but I cannot do further than this. Can you provide a little more hint?
 
  • #19
Adesh said:
Okay, blocks should move as to maintain the length of strings, but I cannot do further than this. Can you provide a little more hint?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20200709_150930.jpg
    IMG_20200709_150930.jpg
    73.5 KB · Views: 142
  • #20
Adesh said:
Okay, blocks should move as to maintain the length of strings, but I cannot do further than this. Can you provide a little more hint?
Expand
$$
\frac{d^2}{dt^2} \left(l_1 +2 l_2+l_4\right) $$
Evaluate the terms, using the variables for the accelerations of the blocks.
 
  • #21
haruspex said:
Expand
$$
\frac{d^2}{dt^2} \left(l_1 +2 l_2+l_4\right) $$
Evaluate the terms, using the variables for the accelerations of the blocks.
$$\frac{d^2 l_1}{dt^2} + 2\frac{d^2 l_2}{dt^2} +\frac{d^2 l_4}{dt^2}=0 $$
$$
a_A +2 a_B =0 $$
$$a_A = -2 a_B$$
But sir, I really cannot convince myself why the second derivative of lengths are giving me the accelerations. Can you please help me in convincing myself?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #22
Adesh said:
But sir, I really cannot convince myself why the second derivative of lengths are giving me the accelerations. Can you please help me in convincing myself?
Express the position of each mass in terms of the lengths. (And correct your last equation.)
 
  • Like
Likes Adesh
  • #23
Doc Al said:
Express the position of each mass in terms of the lengths. (And correct your last equation.)
Okay! We will take the pulley just after the block A as origin, and so we have position of block A as ##(-l_1, 0)## and position of block B is ##(0, -l_2)##. Can you please tell me what’s the significance of constant length of string is here?
 
  • #24
Adesh said:
Can you please tell me what’s the significance of constant length of string is here?
It gives you your equation in post #16.
 
  • Like
Likes Adesh
  • #25
haruspex said:
It gives you your equation in post #16.
Thank you everyone!
 
  • #26
Adesh said:
we have position of block A as ##(-l_1, 0)##
And what is the physical meaning of the second derivative of a position?
 
  • #27
haruspex said:
And what is the physical meaning of the second derivative of a position?
Acceleration.
 
  • #28
Adesh said:
Acceleration.
So what accelerations do the second derivatives of l1 and l2 represent?
 
  • #29
You could also get the constraint equations by putting the work done by string to zero, and then differentiating twice. This works here because the string is massless.
 
  • #30
haruspex said:
So what accelerations do the second derivatives of l1 and l2 represent?
Accelerations of block A and block B.
 
  • #31
Adesh said:
Accelerations of block A and block B.
So what equation do you get by carrying out the differentiation in post #16?
 
  • #32
Adesh said:
...
Please explain me as I have no reason to believe that block A and B will have same acceleration.
Another way to look at this problem:
A moveable pulley can be considered as a second class lever with mechanical advantage of 2.

Moveable-pulley-as-second-class-lever.svg
 
  • Like
Likes Adesh
  • #33
haruspex said:
So what equation do you get by carrying out the differentiation in post #16?
Acceleration of the blocks.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #34
haruspex said:
So what equation do you get by carrying out the differentiation in post #16?
But there is something that is troubling me, ##(-l_1, 0)## is the current position of the block A and ##(0, -l_2)## is the current position of block B, but acceleration is not the second derivative of fixed positions (because in that case it will always come out to be zero). We should say, that at ##t=0## the positions of the blocks were so and so.
 
  • #35
Adesh said:
But there is something that is troubling me, ##(-l_1, 0)## is the current position of the block A and ##(0, -l_2)## is the current position of block B, but acceleration is not the second derivative of fixed positions (because in that case it will always come out to be zero). We should say, that at ##t=0## the positions of the blocks were so and so.
You did not define l1 etc. as merely initial positions. Why should they not mean positions at time t, i.e. define l1 = l1(t) etc.
Also, you don't need to use vector representations. Just define each displacement in the direction that suits it.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Adesh and Delta2
  • #36
haruspex said:
You did not define l1 etc. as merely initial positions. Why should they not mean positions at time t, i.e. define l1 = l1(t) etc.
Also, you don't need to use vector representations. Just define each displacement in the direction that suits it.
Yes, this advice and way of solving it is helping me very much. Now, I’m able to solve almost all problems of pulleys and strings, credit goes to you.

I think these pulleys and strings problems are archetypical, textbooks on Newtonian Mechanics (like French’s Mechanics, Univeristy Physics) don’t actaully teach it exclusively.

Now, I’m into elevator problems :confused:.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
Back
Top