What's the equivalent resistance of this circuit?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the equivalent resistance (Req) of a circuit involving a capacitor and resistors, which is necessary to determine the time constant for the charging process. The original poster struggles to simplify the circuit into a series or parallel configuration, leading to confusion about whether differential equations are required for the solution. Respondents suggest using Kirchhoff's current law and Thevenin's theorem to find the equivalent resistance by suppressing the voltage source and analyzing the circuit from the capacitor's perspective. They emphasize that simplifications can be made to identify the resistors' arrangement. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
lillybeans
Messages
67
Reaction score
1
This was on my physics exam today and I couldn't solve it. Switch (two red dots) was originally open, and when it was open, the capacitor is uncharged. Then the switch was closed, and they asked me to find the time constant of the charging process.

I couldn't find the time constant because I couldn't find the Req. I can not reduce this circuit any further into a simple series/parallel resistors configuration. Clearly they are neither in parallel or series with each other. So in this case, how can I calculate the time constant if Req cannot be found (the resistors are neither in parallel or in series)? Do you need differential equations to solve this? Because we haven't learned anything about that in class. (but still teach me please)

P.S. Time constant=RC

34parft.jpg


Thanks...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe this goes a bit above and beyond what you were taught, but maybe that's what the exam was asking of you. If it was asking too much, then I'm sure very few got this right. You need to look at the current going through the circuit.

Look at the current going into the junction in the top middle between all the resistors (call it 2)
(V-V2)/R1-V2/R2 +(Vc-V2)/R3=0
using the constraint imposed by the junction in the top right
(V2-Vc)/R3-CdVc/dt = 0

So yeah, the way I'd solve the problem to get the time constant would be with differential equations and Kirchoff's current law (currents into a node must be zero). You could potentially use thevenin resistance or superposition, but I think KCL is the most straightforward.
 
lillybeans said:
This was on my physics exam today and I couldn't solve it. Switch (two red dots) was originally open, and when it was open, the capacitor is uncharged. Then the switch was closed, and they asked me to find the time constant of the charging process.

I couldn't find the time constant because I couldn't find the Req. I can not reduce this circuit any further into a simple series/parallel resistors configuration. Clearly they are neither in parallel or series with each other. So in this case, how can I calculate the time constant if Req cannot be found (the resistors are neither in parallel or in series)? Do you need differential equations to solve this? Because we haven't learned anything about that in class. (but still teach me please)

P.S. Time constant=RC

34parft.jpg


Thanks...

The way to find the time constant for the network is to "suppress" the sources, which in this case involves replacing the voltage source with a short circuit (piece of wire) and then find the resulting equivalent resistance looking into the network from where the capacitor connects:

attachment.php?attachmentid=46456&stc=1&d=1334979804.gif


You should be able to see opportunities for simplification of the resistors. The resulting equivalent resistance will be the 'R' in the time constant.

Note that the above is part of the precess involved in finding what is called a Thevenin Equivalent Circuit for a given network.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.8 KB · Views: 710
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top