When is electric field zero and electric potential non zero

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential is a scalar quantity, while electric field strength is a vector quantity. The incorrect statement in the discussion is that electric potential is zero whenever electric field strength is zero. An example provided illustrates that at the midpoint between two positive charges, the electric field can be zero while the electric potential remains non-zero. This is confirmed by the relationship that electric potential decreases with distance, allowing for a constant potential even when the electric field is absent. The reasoning presented is valid, highlighting the distinction between electric field and potential.
mrcotton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which one of the following statements about electric field strength and electric potential is
incorrect?
A Electric potential is a scalar quantity.
B Electric field strength is a vector quantity.
C Electric potential is zero whenever the electric field strength is zero.
D The potential gradient is proportional to the electric field strength.

Homework Equations



E=K Q/(R^2)
V=K Q/R

K=1/(4∏ε)

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is C

If for example you had two positive charges of 3 coulombs a distance 4m apart.
The electrostatic field at the midpoint would be zero. Effectively a positive charge at this point would be push by an equal force in both directions.

However the Electric potential V would be 2*(k*(3/4)

So you can have a zero E with a non zero V

Is this logic ok
Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mrcotton said:


However the Electric potential V would be 2*(k*(3/4)

So you can have a zero E with a non zero V

Is this logic ok
Thanks for any help

The electrical potential goes as 1/r, but your reasoning is correct. You could also consider the electric potential and electric fields associated with spherical conductors: Provided the conductor is closed, the E field inside is 0 but the potential is a constant.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top