When Will the Rod Fall without Slipping?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zemansky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Rod
zemansky
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform rod of mass M and length L is placed vertically on a flat surface. The coefficient of friction between the rod and the surface is μ. The rod is beginning to fall, initially without slipping. To describe the motion of the rod during this stage:
(a) Write down the Lagrangian and derive the equation of motion for the generalized coordinate
\phi.

b) From the Lagrangian derive the expression for the mechanical en- ergy of the system and write down the energy conservation law.

(c) Use Newton’s second law (or D’Alembert’s principle) to derive expressions for the normal (N) and friction (f) forces acting on the rod. Express the answers in terms of \phi only. You can use the results of parts (a) and (b) for this step.

(d) Under what condition will the rod fall all the way to the ground without slipping?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


No attempt to solve this problem has been done. I need help to set up the problem!


 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi zemansky, welcome to PF!

You need to show what you know. What is "Lagrangian"?

ehild
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top