Where Is a Particle Most Likely Found in Quantum Mechanics?

NeedPhysHelp8
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a particle is described by the normalized wave function
\psi(x,y,z) = Axe^{-\alpha x^2}e^{-\beta y^2}e^{-\gamma z^2}
Where all constants are positive and real. The probability that the particle will be found in the infinitesimal volume dxdydz centered at point (x_{0},y_{0},z_{0}) is \mid \psi (x_{0},y_{0},z_{0}) \mid ^2 dxdydz

a) at what values of x_{0} is the particle most likely to be found
b) are there any values of x for which the probability of the particle being found is zero?explain

Homework Equations


Alright so I am a newb when it comes to QM because we're just learning it now, I'm very confused with this question because it asks for probability of x when its over a region of x,y and z. Is it possible to use this \int \mid \psi (x_{0},y_{0},z_{0}) \mid ^2 dxdydz and integrate over all space?? please can someone tell me where to start
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question is kind of poorly worded. If you integrate |psi|^2 over all space, you should get 1 (the probability of finding the particle anywhere is 1), and that let's you fix the constant A in terms of alpha, beta and gamma. What they probably mean by (a) is: for a fixed value of y and z, the neighborhood around what value of x maximizes your probability of finding the particle? In (b), they mean the same sort of thing: are there any regions of space where the particle won't be?
 
ok, but I still don't understand what to do...please someone just tell me where to start i'd really appreciate it this is frustrating me so much
 
For what value(s) of x is |psi|^2 at a maximum? For what value(s) of x is |psi|^2 0?
 
As chrispb noted, the question is a bit ambiguous. What I think they want you do to is find the marginal probability density px(x) and find where it's a maximum and where it's zero. To find px(x), you integrate over y and z, so you're just left with x as a variable.

chrispb suggested the other way to interpret the question. It turns out you'll get the same answer either way because of the wave function you have.
 
oh ok, so i integrate over all space for y and z then I'm left with x and just solve for it then? i'll give er a try
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top