Where Is the Center of Gravity of a Plywood Sheet with a Quadrant Removed?

AI Thread Summary
To find the center of gravity of a 4.00 ft by 8.00 ft plywood sheet with the upper right quadrant removed, the x- and y-coordinates must be calculated using the areas of the remaining sections. The areas of the two sections, A and B, are determined, and their respective centers of gravity are found. The y-coordinate has been calculated correctly as 1.689 ft, but there are discrepancies in the x-coordinate calculations, which should be around 3.612 ft. It's important to consider the full plywood area minus the cutout and apply the center of gravity equations accurately. A clear understanding of the dimensions in feet rather than centimeters is essential for accurate calculations.
kingofretards
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the x- and y-coordinates of the center of gravity of a 4.00 ft by 8.00 ft uniform sheet of plywood with the upper right quadrant removed as shown in the figure below. The dimensions of the cutout are a = 4.30 ft and b = 1.70 ft.

I found:

xA= 3.7/2 cm
xB=3.7+(4.3/2) cm
Ya=2 cm
Yb=2.3/2 cm
Ycm (Y-coordinates)= 1.689 cm

Homework Equations



xcm=maxa+mbxb/ma+mb
ycm=maya+mbyb/ma+mb
ma=(mu)A
mb=(mu)B
m=ma+mb
mass of a= area of A/total area
mass of b= area of B/total area

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the basic steps:
I first 'split' the plywood into two:
A (area: 4 * 3.7 cm^2)
and
B (area: 3.7 * 2.3 cm^2)

I find the centers of gravity of both A and B, and want to find what is the intermediate center of gravity of the whole piece. As I've said before, I've found the y-coordinate of the center of gravity, but somehow miscalculated the x-coordinate.

I've got the y-coordinates (which is 1.689), but somehow I think I made an error in the calculation of the x-coordinates which I calculated as somewhere around 3.3117-3.3118 or 3.312.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please get rid of that 'cm' unit..the problem is in feet... that's the way I order my plywood, in 4' X 8' sheets :smile:. I haven't checked your numbers, but I note that in calculating ther area of B, you used 3.7 (ft) as one of the dimensions when it should be 4.3 ft... and that of course is feet not centimeters ...:wink:
 
That didn't help either It calculated as 3.612, but that was wrong as well.
 
I guess the usual language in which you solve this is - Consider the full plywood 'minus' the cutout. Choose an origin, find center of gravity of the whole plywood, center of gravity of cutout with a negative mass and find the center of gravity of the two using the equations you wrote in OP.

If you are not comfortable with this language, a more detailed/clear answer can be formed, I'm sleepy >.>
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top