Where is the Error in Calculating the Magnetic Field of a Current Loop?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the magnetic field along the z-axis of a circular loop with a constant current, situated in the z=0 plane. The original poster attempts to apply the Biot-Savart law but encounters a discrepancy in their calculations regarding the numerator of the magnetic field expression.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster discusses their approach using the Biot-Savart law and expresses confusion about the resulting terms in their calculations. They question where their reasoning diverges from the expected result.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have suggested external resources for further clarification, while others are questioning the trigonometric relationships involved in the magnetic field calculation.

Contextual Notes

There seems to be a focus on the assumptions made regarding the geometry of the problem, particularly in relation to the angles involved in the magnetic field contributions from the current loop.

AriAstronomer
Messages
46
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find magnetic field along the z-axis of a circular loop, radius R with constant current lying in the z=0 plane.


Homework Equations


vec(r) = vector of r.
zhat = unit vector z.


The Attempt at a Solution


So starting with the definition, B = (u_o I/4pi) (dl x vec(r))/r^3, where:
\vec(r) = z(zhat) - R(s hat), thus:
r = root(z^2 + R^2)

also dl x vec(r) = vec(r)dl(phi x s) = (dl)(-zhat). Since dl = length around current loop = 2piR:
dl x vec(r) = -2piR(zhat) vec(r).

Here's where I get stuck.
If I continue along this line of thought, zhat (from the cross product) dotted with vec(r) will give me z, and my numerator will end up being -2piRz, but the answer says the numerator should be -2piR^2. Basically, I should have an R instead of z, but I don't know where I'm going wrong. I know other approaches will give me the right answer, but can someone identify along my train of thought what the problem with this approach is?

Thanks,
Ari
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm looking at it, but judging from the diagram it looks like dBz should equal cosine theta, not sine theta which is what they're claiming... Still kind of confused.
 
AriAstronomer said:
I'm looking at it, but judging from the diagram it looks like dBz should equal cosine theta, not sine theta which is what they're claiming... Still kind of confused.

Draw your own picture. When theta goes to 90 degrees dB = dB_z as required.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K