Whether equations work to describe motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter PAstudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the use of kinematic equations to describe the motion of an object defined by the position function x=At^2-Bt+C. The first equation, v^2=vo^2+2a(x-xo), is applicable due to the constant acceleration indicated by the quadratic function. However, the second equation, v average=1/2(v+vo), initially appears incorrect but is validated through the calculation of average velocity as displacement over time. The average velocity derived from the position function confirms that the second equation accurately represents the motion. Overall, both equations can effectively describe the object's motion under the given conditions.
PAstudent
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object moves along the x-axis according to the position function x=At^2-Bt+C, where x is in meters and t in seconds; A,B, C are constants. Explain why or why not the equations v^2= vo^2+2a(x-xo) and v average= 1/2(v+vo) can be used to describe the motion of the object. Using mathematics is recommended[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So, the first one would be possible because it is describing a constant acceleration equation and since it is only a polynomial of degree 2 the acceleration would be constant. Also, you can find the velocity by taking the 1st derivative and the acceleration is the second derivative. The second equation is wrong because average velocity is displacement over change in time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PAstudent said:

Homework Statement


An object moves along the x-axis according to the position function x=At^2-Bt+C, where x is in meters and t in seconds; A,B, C are constants. Explain why or why not the equations v^2= vo^2+2a(x-xo) and v average= 1/2(v+vo) can be used to describe the motion of the object. Using mathematics is recommended[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So, the first one would be possible because it is describing a constant acceleration equation and since it is only a polynomial of degree 2 the acceleration would be constant. Also, you can find the velocity by taking the 1st derivative and the acceleration is the second derivative. The second equation is wrong because average velocity is displacement over change in time.
The average velocity is the change in displacement over the change in time. If you evaluate that, you will find that the second equation is correct.

Chet
 
I just don't understand what there is to evaluate . Because I thought avg velocity was x2-x1/t2-t1
 
PAstudent said:
I just don't understand what there is to evaluate . Because I thought avg velocity was x2-x1/t2-t1
##x_2-x_1=At^2-Bt##
##t_2-t_1=t##
Average velocity = ##At-B##
##v_0 = -B##
##v=2At-B##
Average velocity = ##\frac{v_0+v}{2}=At-B##
So what can you say about the second equation in this situation? Does it give the correct average velocity or not?

Chet
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top