Which of the following is vector and which is scalat

  • Thread starter Thread starter vkash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
AI Thread Summary
Angular velocity and angular acceleration are generally considered vector quantities, particularly in three-dimensional space. Instantaneous angular displacement is a vector, while average angular displacement is not. The discussion highlights that in engineering contexts, these quantities are treated as vectors due to their properties in ℝ3. However, in other dimensional spaces, they may be classified differently, such as bivectors. Overall, the consensus supports the classification of angular velocity and acceleration as vectors in typical applications.
vkash
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
which of the following is vector and which is scalar?

angular velocity and angular acceleration are __________ quantity..
my answer is vector. am i correct.
here i am considered about only rotational motion.
somewhere in book it is written as non vector. that's why i am asking it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mod node:

The longish, off-topic, and not all that helpful discussion on angular displacements has been moved to its own thread, [thread]590427[/thread].
[/color]
emailanmol said:
Hey vkash.

This is a good one.

See, instantaneous angular displacement is a vector.

Average angular displacement is not a vector.What does this information tell you about instantaneous angular velocity and acceleration.?
a car is moving in x direction of reference frame with a velocity of 50ms-1. IS it vector or scalar...? i think that's vector.

this is question in my last FIITJEE test. in that test it was question in matrix match, in one side there were these two quantities and in other side their was an option of vector quantity.,

emailanmol said:
What does it tell you about average angular velocity and acceleration?

In exam it has never been mentioned that either a thing is vector or scalar. but i always assume that it is vector to approach my question..
emailanmol said:
Do you know why instantaneous angular displacement is a vector while average angular displacement is not?
i don't know <><><>
i think this might be because of these formulas. L=Iω , L[angular momentum] is vector I[moment of inertia] is not a vector so w[angular velocity] must have been a vector quantity.. IT seems like foolish answer but i am not getting any other answer for this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You are making this way too complicated. Just look up the *definitions* of these two quantities to see if they are vector or scalar.
 
cepheid said:
You are making this way too complicated. Just look up the *definitions* of these two quantities to see if they are vector or scalar.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_velocity
They mention it in 1st line. It is a vector quantity. similarly it's derivative with respect to time will also a vector.
 
The answer is "it depends". In particular, it depends on the dimensionality of the space and whether one considers pseudovectors to be vectors.

In the context of rotations in three dimensional space, angular velocity and angular acceleration can be treated as vectors. Angular velocities and accelerations in ℝ3 have an additive inverse, add, and can be multiplied by a scalar. In this sense they are vectors. They do not act like position and velocity vectors upon reflection. In this sense they are pseudovectors. However, pseudovectors are vectors if you look at them from the context of being a member of a vector space.

Angular velocity and angular acceleration in any dimensional space other than ℝ3 are not vectors. They are instead bivectors or 2-forms. However, this FIITJEE test is apparently with regard to engineering problems. Engineers worry primarily about problems in our 3D world, where angular velocity and angular acceleration are vectors.


Without further details about the question at hand, I would agree that you have the correct answer, vkash.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top