Which optics software is recommended for drawing optics schematics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ricky1986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics Software
AI Thread Summary
For drawing optics schematics, several software options are discussed, including OSLO EDU, which is noted for its complexity. Breault's software (BRO) is recommended due to its long-standing development and collaboration with the University of Arizona. Apex is highlighted as intuitive for those with parametric solid modeling experience, while ASAP is suggested for users comfortable with scripting. The choice of software ultimately depends on specific needs and budget considerations. Overall, while there are various tools available, few match the capabilities of Apex and ASAP.
Physics news on Phys.org
Try looking at www.breault.com (BRO software). They've been developing optical software for decades, and work closely with University of Arizona...one of the best optical studies university in the US. I use Apex, and my senior optics engineer using ASAP. Both are very intuitive... and pricy. It really depends on your need. If you have parametric solid modeling experience I'd look into Apex. If you're into writing script then you could look at ASAP. Again, comes down to your needs & what you're willing to spend. There are many others out there, but none really compare (LightTools, etc).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top