Who is right - me or the book - work and kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force exerted by a worker pushing a crate at an angle below the horizontal while considering kinetic friction. The worker initially assumes that the total work done on the crate is zero due to constant velocity, but fails to account for the vertical component of the applied force, which affects the normal force and, consequently, the frictional force. The correct approach involves resolving the applied force into its x and y components, leading to an increased normal force and a different calculation for friction. The book's answer of 99.2N is reached by properly analyzing these forces, highlighting the importance of considering all components in the scenario. Understanding the relationship between the applied force, normal force, and friction is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
Hemmelig
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
My educated guess would be that I'm wrong

Homework Statement



A factory worker pushes a 30kg crate a distance of 4,5m along a floor at constant velocity, the coefficient of kinetic friction between the crate and floor is 0.25

The angle he pushes the crate with is 30 degrees below the horizontal



Homework Equations



Work = F * s * cos(angle)

Normal force = mg

The Attempt at a Solution



What i do know is that since the velocity is constant, the total work done on the crate is 0

So Work total =Wt = Work done by worker + Work done on crate by friction = 0

So Work done by worker = - work done on crate by friction

Work done by worker = F*s * cos(30)

work done by friction = F*s * cos(180) = F*s*-1

I find the friction force by using the frictional coefficient * the normal force

So F = 0.25 * 30 * 9.81 = 73,575N

F*s*cos(30)= -73,575N*s*-1

I can remove s from both sides

F*cos(30) = 73,575N

F=73,575/cos30 = 84,95N

Which is the wrong result

The book states that the answer is 99.2N

What am i doing wrong ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course, the book is right.

Now, you don't need the energies here. It's all about forces. Since the crate moves at constant velocity, the net force on it should be zero (1st Newton's law).

You ignored the y component of the force that the crate is being pushed by. It effects the force that crate exerts on the ground (it also effects the friction!).
 
As Dr Jekyll states above, leave energies out of it. I can't understand why you're given a distance so ignore that also.

I'd like to say that I can't get that answer if the force acts at an angle below the horizontal yet i get the exact answer if I assume it acts at an angle above, so i'll assume that that part of the information is incorrect (?)

Resolve the components of the force acting on the box into y and x.

Fx = F x cos(30)
Fy = F x sin(30)

The y component of the force acts to increase the normal force, R, experienced by the box;

R = Fy + mg

so you can then work out the frictional force using the formula you've mentioned.

Since the box is at a constant speed, this frictional force should be equal to the x component of force acting on the box. You'll be left with an equation with F. Rearrange this to find your answer.
 
But he's pushing down at the box with an angle of 30 , won't the frictional force be horizontal, as in f x cos (180) then ?
 
Hemmelig said:
Normal force = mg
Since there is an applied force pushing down, the normal force does not equal mg. Figure out the correct normal force by analyzing the vertical components of the forces acting on the crate.
 
The frictional force is equal to your coefficent x the normal force of the box (that is the force exerted by the ground on the box).

The normal force of the box if he's pushing down on it at an angle of 30 degrees will be greater, that is,

R = Fsin(30) + mg

where Fsin(30) is the component of the force in the y direction.

so frictional force = 0.25 * (Fsin(30) + mg)

Does that make sense?

(Apologies for stepping on your toes Doc Al)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top