Why a Wheel Moves When Rotated - Understanding Torque & Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter peter86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation Wheel
AI Thread Summary
A wheel moves when rotated due to the application of torque, which causes it to both rotate and translate. When a force is exerted on the wheel, it creates an unbalanced force that results in translation, as the ground exerts a counterforce that does not negate the torque. Static friction is crucial for maintaining the wheel's grip on the ground; without it, the wheel would slip, leading to sliding friction, which reduces braking efficiency in vehicles. The forces acting on a wheel include engine power, ground friction, and internal friction within the drivetrain, which collectively influence the wheel's motion. Understanding these dynamics illustrates the principles of Newton's third law, where every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
peter86
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why does a wheel move (translate) when it rotates? I mean when you exert a force somewhere on the wheel, it will produce a torque that make it rotate. Now assuming the wheel is in contact with the ground, the wheel will then exert a force on the ground and the ground will exert a counterforce on the wheel. So why doesn't this counterforce counteract on the torque of the wheel and prevent the rotation instead of translation the wheel?

I've been wondering about this for quite some time now but I've found no explanation of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the force is "unbalanced". If you had an equal (and opposite) force at the top of the wheel, then you would stop the wheel without it translating. A single force acting on an object somewhere other than the center of mass gives both a turning moment and a translation. You have to have a "couple" to get only a turning moment.
 
Do you know this? If a wheel rotates, then it is essential that static friction has to act on it. Otherwise it will start to slip or slide.
 
Which is called sliding friction and also explains why cars don't brake very well when they are skidding.
 
Consider a car: what is the source of the forces on the wheels? You have the engine, you have friction with the ground, you have internal friction inside the engine and drivetrain. The friction inside the drivetrain might cut 20% from your engine power, a lot going to the ground. The force of friction may include the ground pushing against the wheel and the wheel pushing against the wall, but that doesn't make the forces on the car balanced. Consider standing on a skateboard and pushing against a wall - the wall pushes back with the same force you push on the wall, and you move.
 
Which is called Newtons third law
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

Wheel moving in rotation and translation
Replies
15
Views
2K
B Static friction needed for rolling without slipping
Replies
4
Views
2K
B The physics of flywheel launchers (like tennis ball shooters)
2
Replies
60
Views
4K
I Solving Wheel Coming to a Stop: FBD, Friction & Hysteresis
Replies
22
Views
4K
Conceptual questions about Angular Momentum Conservation and torque
Replies
2
Views
2K
Opposing force of the axle when a torque is applied to a wheel?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Reaction torque in a traction system
Replies
10
Views
2K
Torque Needs for Rotating Wheels Without Skid
Replies
1
Views
1K
Force on a rotating wheel/disc
Replies
25
Views
2K
A Modeling the damping of a physical rigid pendulum
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top