Why Are 1.2m and 0.45m Unnecessary for Determining Force F?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ry122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beams
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between forces and moments in a beam system. It argues that if the beam is not rotating, the forces F and -F must cancel each other out in both x and y components. However, knowing the couple C1 alone does not eliminate the need for the distances 1.2m and 0.45m when determining the force F. A net moment exists if C1 and Fx are equal, indicating that the couple produced by F must counterbalance C1 for equilibrium. Thus, the values are essential for accurately calculating the forces involved.
Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
In the attached diagram, if the beam was not undergoing any rotation would this be because the couple C1's forces are being canceled by the x components of the forces F and -F and also because the y components of the forces F and -F are canceling each other out?

So if C1 was known and the F force needed to be determined the values 1.2m and .45m would not be needed?
 

Attachments

  • Q66.jpg
    Q66.jpg
    11.9 KB · Views: 422
Physics news on Phys.org
No. If C1 and Fx cancel, there will be a net moment in this problem about the fixed end (try summing moments about the top left corner, and you will see that there is a net moment if C1 and Fx are equal). The only way there is no net moment is if the couple produced by F equals the negative of the couple produced by C1.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top