Why Are There Two Different Expressions for Uncertainty in Quantum Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the two expressions for the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics: Del(X) x Del(P) ≥ h/2π and Del(X) x Del(P) ≥ h/4π. The first expression is traditionally associated with Heisenberg's principle, while the second is derived from Fourier analysis and is favored in modern textbooks. The lecturer indicated that both can be used, but the second expression is more relevant for competitive exams. In one-dimensional scenarios, the lower bound of the uncertainty product aligns with the second expression. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for exam preparation in quantum mechanics.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


According to Heisenberg Uncertainty principle,
Del(X)xdel(P) >= h/2(pi)
But there is also another expression given in my book which is,
Del(X)xdel(P) >= h/4(pi)
I asked my lecturer why is it so? She said that, the second expression is obtained from Fourier analysis. But she also said that in calculations, you can use the first one. Which should I use in competitive exams?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second one is the form given in all modern textbooks and the one you will be expected to use in your exams.
 
In 1D I believe the lower bound on the product of these uncertainties is your second expression.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Help With Heisenberg's Energy-Time Uncertainty Principle
Replies
7
Views
2K
Uncertainties For Wave Packets
Replies
4
Views
905
Propagating Uncertainties in acceleration when using a video software
Replies
6
Views
2K
Momentum of Electron in a Box (IB Physics QM)
Replies
21
Views
2K
Calculating Uncertainty when Converting Time
Replies
3
Views
4K
I Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the canonical momentum operator
Replies
32
Views
3K
Is this a valid derivation of the Uncertainty Principle?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
Replies
2
Views
2K
Setting up an Uncertainty Problem
Replies
5
Views
2K
Uncertainty Principle and single-slit diffraction
Replies
8
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top